
SEA
90-72

TOR
94-68
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
TOR wins
SEA 3 · TOR 4 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked TOR +7pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| TOR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 4 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
oronto Blue Jays held off Seattle Mariners, 4–3. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
SEA · top performer

Cal Raleigh
C
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
TOR · top performer

Andres Gimenez
SS
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreADVANCED


SEA
90-72
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.688 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT23.81 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.310 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 8-32 | 32 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 1 |
TOR
94-68
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.920 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.560 | ||||||||
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 10-31 | 31 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.2 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 1 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 2 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
10
3
Runs
4
0
Errors
0
Playoff series
TOR wins series 4-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 39pp · Bottom 7th Inning
C. Raleigh
CBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.833 OPS
G. Kirby
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 3 K · 1 ER · 4 H · 1 BB
A. Gimenez
SSBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
S. Bieber
SPStarting pitcher
3.2 IP · 5 K · 2 ER · 7 H · 1 BB
How it ended
TOR beat SEA 4-3. Springer's play in the bottom 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (39pp).
Win probability
TOR vs SEA
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactRodr · íguez homered to left center (423 feet).
Raleigh · homered to right (381 feet).
Springer · homered to left center (381 feet), Barger scored and Kiner-Falefa scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| TOR | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | — | 4 |
Period scoring
SEA won 2 · TOR won 1
Inn 1
Naylor 1
Varsho 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Rodr 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Raleigh 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Springer 3
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 533 plays
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Rodríguez struck out swinging.
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
+4pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Jeff Hoffman pitches to Julio Rodriguez
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Canzone struck out swinging.
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
+4pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Jeff Hoffman pitches to Dominic Canzone
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Canzone hit for Robles
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Rivas struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
+7pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Bunted Foul
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Jeff Hoffman pitches to Leo Rivas
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Hoffman relieved Bassitt
·
SEA 3·TOR 4
Straw in left field.
SEA 3·TOR 4
Lukes in right field.
SEA 3·TOR 4
Team stats
SEA
Away
Stat
TOR
Home
3
Runs
4
8
Hits
10
0
Errors
0
16
TB
13
2
HR
1
4
BB
3
9
K
6
13
LOB
16
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
2 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 81 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
57.1%
ensemble · TOR favored
Elo Static
56.5%
P(TOR win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
59.1%
P(TOR win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
56.0%
P(TOR win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.36 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
91% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.