
TOR
94-68

SEA
90-72
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
TOR wins
TOR 8 · SEA 2 (by 6)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked SEA +2pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| SEA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
oronto Blue Jays went into Seattle Mariners and beat them, 8–2. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
TOR · top performer

Andres Gimenez
SS
3-2
AB-H
1
R
4
RBI
SEA · top performer

Josh Naylor
1B
3-3
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


TOR
94-68
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.920 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2-5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 2-5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.560 | ||||||||
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.560 | ||||||||
| Team | 11-36 | 36 | 8 | 11 | 7 | 2 | 4 | 7 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.2 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 5 | 1 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 1 |
SEA
90-72
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.310 | ||||||||
| 3-3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT23.81 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.818 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.920 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 5-29 | 29 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 2.1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 8 | 8 | 4 | 7 | 2 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantTOR
SEA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
5
8
Runs
2
0
Errors
0
Playoff series
Series tied 2-2
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 17pp · Top 3rd Inning
A. Gimenez
SSBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-3 · 1 HR · 2.333 OPS
M. Scherzer
SPStarting pitcher
5.2 IP · 5 K · 2 ER · 3 H · 4 BB
J. Naylor
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
3-for-3 · 1 HR · 3.000 OPS
E. Hancock
SPTop reliever
2.0 IP · 2 K · 2 ER · 2 H · 2 BB
How it ended
TOR beat SEA 8-2.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
SEA vs TOR
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactNaylor · homered to center (394 feet).
Gim · énez homered to right (364 feet), Kiner-Falefa scored.
Springer · doubled to left, Kiner-Falefa scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| SEA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Period scoring
TOR won 4 · SEA won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Naylor 1
Inn 3
Gim 2
Inn 4
Springer 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Jr. 1
Inn 8
Gim 2
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 570 plays
End of the 9th inning
TOR 8·SEA 2
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Canzone struck out looking.
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Naylor to second on wild pitch by Domínguez.
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Naylor to second on wild pitch by Domínguez.
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Seranthony Dominguez pitches to Dominic Canzone
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Suárez popped out to second.
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Seranthony Dominguez pitches to Eugenio Suarez
· ·
TOR 8·SEA 2
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Naylor singled to left.
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Seranthony Dominguez pitches to Josh Naylor
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Polanco flied out to center.
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
TOR 8·SEA 2
Team stats
TOR
Away
Stat
SEA
Home
8
Runs
2
11
Hits
5
0
Errors
0
20
TB
8
2
HR
1
4
BB
5
7
K
8
14
LOB
9
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
2 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 81 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
50.6%
ensemble · SEA favored
Elo Static
51.7%
P(SEA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
52.4%
P(SEA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
52.2%
P(SEA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.29 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.