
SEA
90-72

TOR
94-68
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
SEA wins
SEA 10 · TOR 3 (by 7)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked TOR +5pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| TOR | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
eattle Mariners went into Toronto Blue Jays and beat them, 10–3. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
SEA · top performer

Josh Naylor
1B
4-3
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
TOR · top performer

Nathan Lukes
RF
4-3
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


SEA
90-72
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 3 | |
SPRINT28.688 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.310 | ||||||||
| 3-4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT23.81 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 10-36 | 36 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 3 | 6 | 14 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.0 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
TOR
94-68
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.920 | ||||||||
| 3-4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 6-32 | 32 | 3 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 14 | 3 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantSEA
TOR
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
10
Hits
6
10
Runs
3
1
Errors
1
Playoff series
SEA leads series 2-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 27pp · Top 5th Inning
J. Naylor
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
3-for-4 · 1 HR · 2.250 OPS
L. Gilbert
SPStarting pitcher
3.0 IP · 2 K · 2 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
N. Lukes
RFBatter of the game
3-for-4 · 1 R · 1.500 OPS
T. Yesavage
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 4 K · 5 ER · 4 H · 3 BB
How it ended
SEA beat TOR 10-3. Polanco's play in the top 5th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (27pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
TOR vs SEA
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactRodr · íguez homered to left (370 feet), Arozarena scored and Raleigh scored.
Lukes · singled to right, Clement scored, Springer to third.
Polanco · homered to center (400 feet), Arozarena scored and Raleigh scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SEA | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
| TOR | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Period scoring
SEA won 4 · TOR won 1
Inn 1
Rodr 3
Lukes 1
Inn 2
Lukes 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Polanco 3
Inn 6
Crawford 1
Inn 7
Naylor 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 647 plays
End of the 9th inning
SEA 10·TOR 3
·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Springer grounded into double play, third to second to first, Schneider out at second.
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Emerson Hancock pitches to George Springer
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Giménez struck out swinging.
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 7 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Emerson Hancock pitches to Andres Gimenez
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Schneider walked.
·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Looking
·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Emerson Hancock pitches to Davis Schneider
·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Mastrobuoni at first base.
SEA 10·TOR 3
Bottom of the 9th inning
SEA 10·TOR 3
Middle of the 9th inning
SEA 10·TOR 3
· ·
SEA 10·TOR 3
Team stats
SEA
Away
Stat
TOR
Home
10
Runs
3
10
Hits
6
1
Errors
1
21
TB
7
3
HR
0
6
BB
5
14
K
5
14
LOB
18
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
1 of 13 players in cohortHistorical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 81 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
54.6%
ensemble · TOR favored
Elo Static
55.1%
P(TOR win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
55.8%
P(TOR win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
54.6%
P(TOR win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.49 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.