
CHC
92-70

MIL
97-65
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIL wins
CHC 3 · MIL 9 (by 6)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIL +7pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MIL | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
ilwaukee Brewers held off Chicago Cubs, 9–3. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Michael Busch
1B
4-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MIL · top performer

Jackson Chourio
LF
3-3
AB-H
1
R
3
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
92-70
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT29.294 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 6-33 | 33 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 0.2 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 4.1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 13 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 |
MIL
97-65
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 3-3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.96 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 13-37 | 37 | 9 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 5 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 9 | 2 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 | 3 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
MIL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
13
3
Runs
9
1
Errors
0
Playoff series
MIL leads series 1-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 11pp · Bottom 1st Inning
M. Busch
1BBatter of the game
1-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.250 OPS
A. Civale
SPTop reliever
4.1 IP · 3 K · 0 ER · 3 H
J. Chourio
LFBatter of the gamePerfect day
3-for-3 · 1 R · 2.000 OPS
F. Peralta
SPStarting pitcher
5.2 IP · 9 K · 2 ER · 4 H · 3 BB
How it ended
MIL beat CHC 9-3.
Win probability
MIL vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactTurang · doubled to right, Chourio scored.
Frelick · safe at first on fielding error by second baseman Hoerner, Contreras scored, Vaughn to second.
Chourio · singled to left, Frelick scored and Perkins scored, Ortiz to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| MIL | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 9 |
Period scoring
CHC won 2 · MIL won 2
Inn 1
Chourio 2
Inn 2
Durbin 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Happ 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Hoerner 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 597 plays
· ·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Ballesteros grounded out to first.
· ·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Swanson to third on fielder's indifference.
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Swanson to third on fielder's indifference.
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Nick Mears pitches to Moises Ballesteros
· ·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Ballesteros hit for Shaw
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Swanson doubled to left.
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Nick Mears pitches to Dansby Swanson
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Crow-Armstrong struck out looking.
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Looking
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Nick Mears pitches to Pete Crow-Armstrong
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Kelly struck out swinging.
·
CHC 3·MIL 9
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
MIL
Home
3
Runs
9
6
Hits
13
1
Errors
0
16
TB
17
3
HR
0
3
BB
5
12
K
8
9
LOB
22
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 14 players in cohortHistorical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
56.5%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
57.4%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
55.1%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
57.6%
P(MIL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.13 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
93% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.