
PHI
67-49

TEX
60-58
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PHI wins
PHI 3 · TEX 2 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked TEX +0pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| TEX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
hiladelphia Phillies went into Texas Rangers and beat them, 3–2. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PHI · top performer

Bryson Stott
2B
3-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
TEX · top performer

Corey Seager
SS
4-2
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


PHI
67-49
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.688 | ||||||||
| Team | 7-32 | 32 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 11 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 9 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 1 |
TEX
60-58
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT24.96 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.735 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9-34 | 34 | 2 | 9 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.2 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 8 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 11 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPHI
TEX
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
9
3
Runs
2
0
Errors
0
Current series
PHI wins series 3-0
Season series
PHI leads series 2-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 35pp · Top 7th Inning
B. Stott
2BBatter of the game
2-for-3 · 1.333 OPS
J. Luzardo
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 4 K · 1 ER · 7 H · 1 BB
C. Seager
SSBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
J. deGrom
SPStarting pitcher
6.2 IP · 8 K · 3 ER · 6 H · 1 BB
How it ended
PHI beat TEX 3-2. Kepler's play in the top 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (35pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
TEX vs PHI
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactKepler · doubled to right, Bader scored and Marsh scored.
Seager · homered to left center (406 feet).
A. Garc · ía grounded out to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| TEX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Period scoring
PHI won 1 · TEX won 2
Inn 1
Langford 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Kepler 2
Inn 8
Seager 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 528 plays
End of the 9th inning
PHI 3·TEX 2
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Smith grounded out to second.
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
−4pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Jhoan Duran pitches to Josh Smith
· ·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Smith hit for Heim
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pederson struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
−7pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Jhoan Duran pitches to Joc Pederson
· ·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pederson hit for Burger
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
A. García grounded out to second.BIG MOMENT
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
−9pp
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Jhoan Duran pitches to Adolis Garcia
· ·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Duran relieved Strahm
· ·
PHI 3·TEX 2
Bottom of the 9th inning
PHI 3·TEX 2
Team stats
PHI
Away
Stat
TEX
Home
3
Runs
2
7
Hits
9
0
Errors
0
9
TB
14
0
HR
1
2
BB
1
11
K
6
9
LOB
11
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 15 players in cohortHistorical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 81 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
49.2%
ensemble · PHI favored
Elo Static
50.4%
P(TEX win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
51.5%
P(TEX win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
51.0%
P(TEX win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.45 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.