
SF
56-57

PIT
49-64
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PIT wins
SF 4 · PIT 5 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked PIT +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| PIT | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
ittsburgh Pirates held off San Francisco Giants, 5–4. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
SF · top performer

Heliot Ramos
LF
5-3
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
PIT · top performer

Jack Suwinski
RF
3-1
AB-H
2
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


SF
56-57
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 3-5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.251 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Team | 7-34 | 34 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 11 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.1 | 6 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 8 | 1 |
PIT
49-64
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.85 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.428 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 6-31 | 31 | 5 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2.2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2.2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 11 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantSF
PIT
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
6
4
Runs
5
2
Errors
0
Current series
SF wins series 2-1
Season series
PIT leads series 4-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 74pp · Bottom 9th Inning
H. Ramos
LFBatter of the game
3-for-5 · 1 R · 1.200 OPS
J. Verlander
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 4 K · 0 ER · 3 H · 1 BB
J. Suwinski
RFBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.667 OPS
K. Nicolas
RPTop reliever
2.2 IP · 3 K · 2 ER · 2 H · 2 BB
How it ended
PIT beat SF 5-4. Bart's play in the bottom 9th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (74pp).
Win probability
PIT vs SF
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactLee · tripled to right, Adames scored and Chapman scored.
Suwinski · homered to right (371 feet), Peguero scored.
Bart · singled to left, Canario scored, Suwinski to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| PIT | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
Period scoring
SF won 2 · PIT won 2
Inn 1
Smith 1
Gonzales 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Lee 2
Inn 6
Inn 7
Suwinski 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Bart 1
Play-by-play · 615 plays
· ·
SF 4·PIT 5
Kiner-Falefa grounded into fielder's choice to first, Suwinski scored, Davis third.
· ·
SF 4·PIT 5
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
SF 4·PIT 5
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
Davis to second on fielder's indifference.
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
Davis to second on fielder's indifference.
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
Randy Rodriguez pitches to Isiah Kiner-Falefa
· ·
SF 4·PIT 5
Davis ran for Bart
·
SF 4·PIT 4
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
Bart singled to left, Canario scored, Suwinski to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
+74pp
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Pitch 5 : Ball 1
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Randy Rodriguez pitches to Joey Bart
· ·
SF 4·PIT 4
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Suwinski hit by pitch, Canario to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
+10pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
SF 4·PIT 3
Team stats
SF
Away
Stat
PIT
Home
4
Runs
5
7
Hits
6
2
Errors
0
9
TB
10
0
HR
1
5
BB
3
11
K
8
20
LOB
11
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 72 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
51.9%
ensemble · PIT favored
Elo Static
53.5%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
53.8%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
52.8%
P(PIT win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.42 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 12 players in cohort