
CHC
63-45

MIL
64-44
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
CHC 10 · MIL 3 (by 7)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIL +9pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| MIL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs went into Milwaukee Brewers and beat them, 10–3. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Ian Happ
LF
2-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MIL · top performer

William Contreras
C
4-2
AB-H
2
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
63-45
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
| 3-4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT29.294 | ||||||||
| 0-5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.53 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| Team | 11-37 | 37 | 10 | 11 | 10 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 8 | 2 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 10 | 2 |
MIL
64-44
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.790 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.96 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-33 | 33 | 3 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.0 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 10 | 10 | 5 | 9 | 2 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
MIL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
7
10
Runs
3
0
Errors
0
Current series
Series tied 3-3
Season series
Series tied 4-4
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 24pp · Top 3rd Inning
I. Happ
LFBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-2 · 1 HR · 2.500 OPS
S. Imanaga
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 8 K · 3 ER · 5 H
W. Contreras
CBatter of the game2-HR game
2-for-4 · 2 HR · 2.500 OPS
F. Peralta
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 3 K · 5 ER · 5 H · 4 BB
How it ended
CHC beat MIL 10-3. Ballesteros's play in the top 3rd inning drove the biggest swing of the night (24pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
MIL vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactContreras · homered to left (371 feet).
Crow-Armstrong · doubled to right, Tucker scored, Suzuki to third.
Ballesteros · doubled to left, Crow-Armstrong scored, Hoerner scored and Kelly scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| MIL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Period scoring
CHC won 3 · MIL won 2
Inn 1
Contreras 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Ballesteros 3
Inn 4
Contreras 1
Inn 5
Frelick 1
Inn 6
Tucker 2
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Hoerner 1
Play-by-play · 595 plays
End of the 9th inning
CHC 10·MIL 3
· ·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Turang grounded out to first.
· ·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Durbin to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Durbin to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Daniel Palencia pitches to Brice Turang
· ·
CHC 10·MIL 3
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Durbin singled to center.
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Daniel Palencia pitches to Caleb Durbin
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Vaughn flied out to right.
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Daniel Palencia pitches to Andrew Vaughn
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Jansen struck out looking.
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHC 10·MIL 3
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
MIL
Home
10
Runs
3
11
Hits
7
0
Errors
0
23
TB
14
2
HR
2
5
BB
0
9
K
10
18
LOB
6
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
59.5%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
58.6%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
59.8%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
58.8%
P(MIL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.52 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 14 players in cohort