
CHC
62-44

MIL
63-43
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIL wins
CHC 4 · MIL 8 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIL +6pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
ilwaukee Brewers held off Chicago Cubs, 8–4.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Michael Busch
1B
3-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MIL · top performer

Sal Frelick
RF
4-2
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
62-44
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| Team | 6-32 | 32 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 14 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 3 |
MIL
63-43
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.790 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.96 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 10-32 | 32 | 8 | 10 | 8 | 3 | 5 | 3 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.0 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
MIL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
10
4
Runs
8
0
Errors
1
Current series
Series tied 3-3
Season series
Series tied 3-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 19pp · Bottom 3rd Inning
M. Busch
1BBatter of the game
2-for-3 · 1 R · 1.417 OPS
M. Boyd
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 2 K · 5 ER · 6 H · 5 BB
S. Frelick
RFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.850 OPS
J. Misiorowski
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 7 K · 2 ER · 3 H · 2 BB
How it ended
MIL beat CHC 8-4. Collins's play in the bottom 3rd inning drove the biggest swing of the night (19pp).
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHapp · reached on infield single to pitcher, Tucker scored and Suzuki scored on throwing error by pitcher Misiorowski.
Collins · singled to right, Contreras scored and Yelich scored, Vaughn to third.
Vaughn · homered to left center (398 feet).
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | — | 8 |
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
MIL
Home
4
Runs
8
6
Hits
10
0
Errors
1
6
TB
20
0
HR
3
5
BB
5
14
K
3
15
LOB
10
Win probability
MIL vs CHC
Period scoring
CHC won 1 · MIL won 4
Inn 1
Happ 2
Inn 2
Inn 3
Collins 2
Inn 4
Inn 5
Vaughn 1
Inn 6
Frelick 1
Inn 7
Tucker 1
Yelich 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 560 plays
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Suzuki struck out swinging.
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
+1pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Trevor Megill pitches to Seiya Suzuki
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Megill relieved Yoho
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Tucker walked.
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
−0.9pp
Pitch 5 : Ball 4
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 4 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 3 : Ball 3
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Busch to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Busch to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Craig Yoho pitches to Kyle Tucker
· ·
CHC 4·MIL 8
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Busch walked.
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 4 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 3 : Ball 3
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Craig Yoho pitches to Michael Busch
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Shaw flied out to center.
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 4·MIL 8
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
55.3%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
56.2%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
54.8%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
56.4%
P(MIL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.71 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
95% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs