
PIT
45-62

SF
54-53
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PIT wins
PIT 6 · SF 5 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked SF +5pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| SF | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
ittsburgh Pirates went into San Francisco Giants and beat them, 6–5. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PIT · top performer

Spencer Horwitz
1B
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
SF · top performer

Willy Adames
SS
5-3
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


PIT
45-62
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.560 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9-35 | 35 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 2.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 8 | 0 |
SF
54-53
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.251 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 3-5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT24.32 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 11-37 | 37 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
| 3.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 9 | 6 | 6 | 4 | 8 | 2 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPIT
SF
No arsenal data yet for this team’s pitchers.
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
9
Hits
11
6
Runs
5
0
Errors
0
Current series
PIT wins series 3-0
Season series
PIT leads series 1-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 31pp · Top 7th Inning
S. Horwitz
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
M. Keller
SPStarting pitcher
2.0 IP · 3 K · 3 ER · 5 H · 3 BB
W. Adames
SSBatter of the game
3-for-5 · 1 R · 1.200 OPS
C. Whisenhunt
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 3 K · 4 ER · 5 H · 2 BB
How it ended
PIT beat SF 6-5. McCutchen's play in the top 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (31pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
SF vs PIT
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactKiner-Falefa · doubled to center, Peguero scored and Canario scored.
McCutchen · homered to left (383 feet), Pham scored.
Bailey · grounded out to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PIT | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| SF | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Period scoring
PIT won 2 · SF won 2
Inn 1
Gonzales 1
Chapman 1
Inn 2
Kiner-Falefa 2
Wisely 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Adames 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
McCutchen 2
Inn 8
Inn 9
Lee 1
Play-by-play · 633 plays
End of the 9th inning
PIT 6·SF 5
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Bailey grounded out to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
−15pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
David Bednar pitches to Patrick Bailey
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Yastrzemski popped out to shortstop.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
−15pp
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
David Bednar pitches to Mike Yastrzemski
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Matos ran for Flores
·
PIT 6·SF 5
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Flores singled to left, Lee to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
+10pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
David Bednar pitches to Wilmer Flores
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
·
PIT 6·SF 5
Lee singled to left, Adames scored.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
+7pp
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
· ·
PIT 6·SF 5
Pitch 6 : Ball 2
· ·
PIT 6·SF 4
Team stats
PIT
Away
Stat
SF
Home
6
Runs
5
9
Hits
11
0
Errors
0
17
TB
16
2
HR
0
4
BB
5
8
K
8
14
LOB
28
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
3 of 10 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 72 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
54.4%
ensemble · SF favored
Elo Static
55.3%
P(SF win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
54.3%
P(SF win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
55.9%
P(SF win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.66 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs