
NYM
61-44

SF
54-51
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
NYM wins
NYM 2 · SF 1 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked NYM +1pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| SF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
ew York Mets went into San Francisco Giants and beat them, 2–1. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
NYM · top performer

Starling Marte
RF
3-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
SF · top performer

Jung Hoo Lee
RF
4-3
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


NYM
61-44
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.29 | ||||||||
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.411 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 7-34 | 34 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 5 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 7 | 0 |
SF
54-51
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.251 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 3-4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 9-33 | 33 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 7 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantNYM
SF
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
9
2
Runs
1
0
Errors
2
Current series
NYM win series 3-0
Season series
NYM lead series 2-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 35pp · Top 6th Inning
S. Marte
RFBatter of the game
2-for-3 · 1 R · 1.417 OPS
D. Peterson
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 4 K · 1 ER · 8 H · 3 BB
J. Lee
RFBatter of the game
3-for-4 · 1.500 OPS
R. Ray
SPStarting pitcher
5.2 IP · 3 K · 2 ER · 5 H · 3 BB
How it ended
NYM beat SF 2-1. Vientos's play in the top 6th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (35pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
SF vs NYM
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactAdames · singled to right.
Vientos · doubled to left, Marte scored and Soto scored.
Lee · doubled to right.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| SF | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Period scoring
NYM won 1 · SF won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Lee 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Vientos 2
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 558 plays
End of the 9th inning
NYM 2·SF 1
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Bailey lined out to first.BIG MOMENT
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
−12pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Edwin Diaz pitches to Patrick Bailey
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Yastrzemski struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
−12pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Edwin Diaz pitches to Mike Yastrzemski
· ·
NYM 2·SF 1
Yastrzemski hit for Matos
·
NYM 2·SF 1
·
NYM 2·SF 1
Lee doubled to right.BIG MOMENT
·
NYM 2·SF 1
+15pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
NYM 2·SF 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
NYM 2·SF 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
NYM 2·SF 1
Edwin Diaz pitches to Jung Hoo Lee
·
NYM 2·SF 1
·
NYM 2·SF 1
Schmitt lined out to third.BIG MOMENT
·
NYM 2·SF 1
−9pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
NYM 2·SF 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
NYM 2·SF 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
NYM 2·SF 1
Edwin Diaz pitches to Casey Schmitt
·
NYM 2·SF 1
Díaz relieved Stanek
·
NYM 2·SF 1
Bottom of the 9th inning
NYM 2·SF 1
Team stats
NYM
Away
Stat
SF
Home
2
Runs
1
7
Hits
9
0
Errors
2
12
TB
10
0
HR
0
5
BB
3
8
K
7
22
LOB
17
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 61 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.9%
ensemble · NYM favored
Elo Static
48.5%
P(SF win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
49.2%
P(SF win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
49.9%
P(SF win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.57 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.