
MIL
60-41

SEA
54-47
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
SEA wins
MIL 0 · SEA 1 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIL +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
eattle Mariners held off Milwaukee Brewers, 1–0. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
MIL · top performer

Jackson Chourio
LF
3-2
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
SEA · top performer

Cal Raleigh
C
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


MIL
60-41
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT24.96 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 2-3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 3-30 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 |
SEA
54-47
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.688 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 4-26 | 26 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 0 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
3
Hits
4
0
Runs
1
0
Errors
0
Current series
MIL wins series 2-1
Season series
Series tied 1-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 19pp · Bottom 6th Inning
J. Chourio
LFBatter of the game
2-for-3 · 1.417 OPS
J. Misiorowski
SPStarting pitcher
3.2 IP · 7 K · 0 ER · 3 H · 1 BB
C. Raleigh
CBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.667 OPS
L. Gilbert
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.1 IP · 10 K · 0 ER · 2 H
How it ended
SEA beat MIL 1-0. Raleigh's play in the bottom 6th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (19pp).
Win probability
SEA vs MIL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactRaleigh · homered to right (391 feet).
Contreras · walked.
Collins · struck out looking.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | — | 1 |
Period scoring
MIL won 0 · SEA won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Raleigh 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 499 plays
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Vaughn grounded into fielder's choice to third, Chourio out at second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
+13pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Andres Munoz pitches to Andrew Vaughn
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Collins struck out looking.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
+14pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Andres Munoz pitches to Isaac Collins
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Chourio walked.
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
−4pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Andres Munoz pitches to Jackson Chourio
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Yelich struck out swinging, Perkins to second on wild pitch by Muñoz.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
+7pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 0·SEA 1
Team stats
MIL
Away
Stat
SEA
Home
0
Runs
1
3
Hits
4
0
Errors
0
3
TB
8
0
HR
1
3
BB
2
13
K
10
13
LOB
9
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
130
projections · 81 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.7%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
45.6%
P(SEA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
46.7%
P(SEA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
46.0%
P(SEA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.45 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.