
MIL
60-40

SEA
53-47
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIL wins
MIL 6 · SEA 0 (by 6)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIL +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
ilwaukee Brewers went into Seattle Mariners and beat them, 6–0. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
MIL · top performer

Brice Turang
2B
4-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
SEA · top performer

Luke Raley
RF
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


MIL
60-40
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.96 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Team | 10-33 | 33 | 6 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
SEA
53-47
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.310 | ||||||||
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Team | 5-31 | 31 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 2 | 6 | 0 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
10
Hits
5
6
Runs
0
0
Errors
1
Current series
MIL wins series 2-1
Season series
MIL leads series 1-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 12pp · Top 6th Inning
B. Turang
2BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 R · 1.000 OPS
B. Woodruff
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 5 K · 0 ER · 2 H
L. Raley
RFBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
G. Kirby
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 3 K · 4 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
How it ended
MIL beat SEA 6-0.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
SEA vs MIL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactWilliamson · singled to right.
Turang · doubled to center, Ortiz to third.
Chourio · doubled to center, Yelich scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| SEA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Period scoring
MIL won 2 · SEA won 0
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Contreras 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Yelich 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 514 plays
End of the 9th inning
MIL 6·SEA 0
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Moore struck out swinging.
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Grant Anderson pitches to Dylan Moore
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Solano hit by pitch.
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Polanco to second on fielder's indifference.
·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Polanco to second on fielder's indifference.
·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Grant Anderson pitches to Donovan Solano
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Polanco grounded into fielder's choice to second, Raleigh out at second.
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Grant Anderson pitches to Jorge Polanco
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Arozarena struck out swinging.
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
MIL 6·SEA 0
Team stats
MIL
Away
Stat
SEA
Home
6
Runs
0
10
Hits
5
0
Errors
1
13
TB
5
0
HR
0
2
BB
1
6
K
8
7
LOB
16
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
130
projections · 81 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.7%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
46.9%
P(SEA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
45.7%
P(SEA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
47.0%
P(SEA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.59 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.