
PHI
91-62

LAD
85-67
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
LAD wins
PHI 0 · LAD 5 (by 5)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked PHI +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| LAD | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
os Angeles Dodgers held off Philadelphia Phillies, 5–0.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PHI · top performer

Nick Castellanos
RF
3-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
LAD · top performer

Freddie Freeman
1B
4-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreADVANCED


PHI
91-62
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT25.818 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.688 | ||||||||
| Team | 3-30 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 2 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 7 | 2 |
LAD
85-67
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.74 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 7-30 | 30 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 7 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 13 | 0 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
3
Hits
7
0
Runs
5
1
Errors
0
Current series
PHI wins series 2-1
Season series
PHI wins series 4-2
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 9pp · Bottom 2nd Inning
N. Castellanos
RFBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 0.833 OPS
J. Luzardo
SPStarting pitcher
7.0 IP · 6 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 1 BB
F. Freeman
1BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
B. Snell
SPStarting pitcherGem
7.0 IP · 12 K · 0 ER · 2 H · 2 BB
How it ended
LAD beat PHI 5-0.
Win probability
LAD vs PHI
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactFreeman · homered to center (419 feet).
Rortvedt · singled to center, Rojas scored, Pages to third.
E. Hern · ández singled to center, Pages scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| LAD | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | — | 5 |
Period scoring
PHI won 0 · LAD won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Freeman 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Hern 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Ohtani 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 521 plays
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Kepler popped out to third.
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Tanner Scott pitches to Max Kepler
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Castellanos singled to center, Harper to third.
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Tanner Scott pitches to Nick Castellanos
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Realmuto lined out to left.
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 6 : Ball 3
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Tanner Scott pitches to J.T. Realmuto
· ·
PHI 0·LAD 5
·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Harper walked.
·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 4
·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 3
·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Tanner Scott pitches to Bryce Harper
·
PHI 0·LAD 5
·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Schwarber struck out swinging.
·
PHI 0·LAD 5
Team stats
PHI
Away
Stat
LAD
Home
0
Runs
5
3
Hits
7
1
Errors
0
3
TB
13
0
HR
2
3
BB
2
13
K
7
7
LOB
6
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
3 of 10 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
119
projections · 79 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.7%
ensemble · PHI favored
Elo Static
46.0%
P(LAD win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
47.9%
P(LAD win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
46.7%
P(LAD win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.78 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
95% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs