Free during beta —Free during beta — to track favorite players + get game alertsto track favorites + alerts
ESPN
PF#32 of 32 bigs in 2026
Ben Humrichous
Developmental big
Illinois·23.9 yo at draft
Undrafted/honor mention
ATH composite
—
NCAA dominance
63
Scoring
43
Playmaking
73
Defense
43
Shooting
57
Draft score 1 out of 100, overall rank 103.
Data completeness
grade C · 47/1000/7 combine drills · D1 stats matched (6/6) · 1 mock board · birthdate known
measures the data backing this profile — not confidence in the ranking
The read · from the percentiles
auto-derived · 2026 classDevelopmental big. A balanced statistical profile with no standout axis; the question marks are shot creation (3rd) and rebounding (6th).
WatchShot creation3Rebounding6
Draft outlook
Where the math lands them
Projected landing
Outside the top 60
THE ONE has them at #103, below the two-round projection window.
Model vs the field
The One
#103
Field
#100
In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.
across 1 mock board
Scouting summary
Developmental big profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 97th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 63 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 100th across 1 board.
Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.
Our board over time
Where we've had him since Jun 20
now#103▲ Riser · up 2
Jun 20 · #105Aug 3 · #103
How the score is built
deterministic · auditable0.7draft scoreboard #103
Market 62% · consensus 100th / 1 boardModel 38% · ranked 90th
Our blend weights the mock-consensus board 62% and our deterministic, age-adjusted model 38% — the market had Humrichous 100th, our model 90th. The model's own dominance / production / athletic split is in the card above.
Draft score breakdown
How the 1-point composite stacks up
Athletic compositeweight 40%—
no 2026 combine row yet
NCAA dominanceweight 40%63
Mock consensusweight 20%0
avg rank 100 across 1 boards
Deterministic signals · v1 rules
- +6
Elite BPM
BPM = 97th pct
- -2
Older for class
age 23.9 at draft; class median 22.4
- -1
Limited consensus coverage
fewer than two mock-board sources
- 0
No combine
athleticism held at neutral fallback
Skill radar · the shape of his game
percentile vs the 2026 class · at positionAvg axis 13th · each vertex is a positional percentile in the 2026 class.
Combine radar · vs. B-bucket
No combine on file
Wingspan
med 85.8"
—
—
Standing reach
med 108.0"
—
—
Max vertical
med 32.5"
—
—
Standing vert
med 28.5"
—
—
¾ sprint
med 3.33s
—
—
Lane agility
med 11.65s
—
—
Shuttle
med 3.10s
—
—
No combine testing on file for this prospect · the rings show the position-group distribution (2000–2025).
Two-way profile · how they play
No Synergy two-way data for Humrichous — typically an overseas or G League Elite prospect outside Synergy's college coverage, not a low-efficiency read.
NBA comps · college production
vs bigs · 2012–2024Closest NBA comparisons
College production only · Humrichous didn't test at the combine, so these comps are matched on college box-score production (BPM, TS%, usage, assists) vs the position cohort — not measurables.
Matched on college production (BPM, TS%, usage, assists), within position group. Each comp's tag shows which basis drove it; the college production + career outcome shown belongs to the comp, never projected onto Humrichous.
“Top X%” = closer to Humrichous than (100−X)% of all drafted bigs on the measurables + production; the bar shows relative closeness among these 5.
- 1Omari Spellman2018top 1%
production only · matched on 5 of 4 production
Became: Fringe NBA · 0.2 career VORP · 95 g
College: Villanova '18 · TS 58.8 · BPM 8.0
BPM8.8vs8.0AST%5.9vs4.3PORPAG2.8vs3.5TS%55.6vs58.8USG%11.5vs17.9 - 2Fab Melo2012top 1%
production only · matched on 6 of 4 production
Became: Fringe NBA · -0.1 career VORP · 6 g
College: Syracuse '12 · TS 58.1 · BPM 8.8
BPM8.8vs8.8AST%5.9vs5.0PORPAG2.8vs2.1TS%55.6vs58.1Age23.9vs22.0USG%11.5vs17.1 - 3Yves Pons2021top 1%
production only · matched on 6 of 4 production
Became: Never reached the NBA · 0 g
College: Tennessee '21 · TS 53.8 · BPM 5.8
AST%5.9vs5.1TS%55.6vs53.8PORPAG2.8vs2.0BPM8.8vs5.8USG%11.5vs15.6Age23.9vs22.3 - 4Keshad Johnson2024top 2%
production only · matched on 6 of 4 production
Became: Too early to grade · 0 g
College: Arizona '24 · TS 61.6 · BPM 8.6
BPM8.8vs8.6PORPAG2.8vs3.2Age23.9vs23.0AST%5.9vs10.8TS%55.6vs61.6USG%11.5vs18.3 - 5Ryan Dunn2024top 2%
production only · matched on 6 of 4 production
Became: Too early to grade · -0.4 career VORP · 144 g
College: Virginia '24 · TS 56.4 · BPM 9.0
AST%5.9vs6.0BPM8.8vs9.0TS%55.6vs56.4PORPAG2.8vs2.0USG%11.5vs17.0Age23.9vs21.5
Per-axis gap● near (under ½ SD)● ~1 SD● far (over 1 SD)
Comp outcomes · real careers
7/11 reached the NBAHow the closest comps turned out
1 Starter1 Rotation5 Fringe4 Never reached NBA
Median outcome: Fringe — the typical case among these comps, between the floor and ceiling.
Ceiling
Gorgui Dieng2013
Starter · 7.1 VORP
Floor
Marcus Lee2016
Never reached NBA
The 15 nearest blended comps (4 too recent to grade). These are the comps' own careers — a range of what the profile has become before, not a projection of Humrichous.
College teamIllinoisB10#6 T-Rank28-9SOS elite schedule · top 2%via BartTorvik
College stats · 2025-26 season
Illinois· B10
37 games · 56% min
labeled Stretch 4
Efficiency
- TS%55.6%67
- eFG%53.8%68
- USG%11.5%17
- ORTG136.197
- AdjOE128.195
- RIM%57.1%26
Playmaking
- AST%5.9%56
- TO%4.5%86
Defense
- STL%1.1%50
- BLK%3.3%56
- DRTG96.676
- DBPM+3.788
Rebounding
- ORB%5.9%29
- DRB%13.4%34
Composite
- BPM+8.897
- OBPM+5.197
- PORPAG2.893
via BartTorvik · percentiles vs B-bucket of all D1 history (2008-26)
Per-game production · 2025-26
percentile vs D1 2008-25 · at position37 games· 22.5 mpg
Points
5.870
Rebounds
3.968
Assists
0.879
Steals
0.469
Blocks
0.672
ShootingFG 38.3%3PT 36.1%FT 79.2%
per-game · via barttorvik · percentiles vs all D1 2008-25 at the position
Raw per-game counts — not pace-adjusted; ranked against an 18-season D1 reference where elite-tier percentiles are stable across the window.
X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit
Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.
Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · Jun 25, 2026
Get the 2027 big board the day it drops
Plus pick-by-pick grades on draft night — and we grade our own board against the actual draft, misses included. Free, double opt-in.