
CHC
29-18

CHW
24-22
Line movement
200 snapshots
CHW spread
+1.5
open +1.5
Total
O/U 8.5
open O/U 8.5
CHW no-vig %
43.7%
open 43.7%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = CHW favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHW wins
CHC 8 · CHW 9 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHC +1pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| CHW | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Line shopping · 1 book
Same model, different prices. The same moneyline can vary 25¢ across books — taking the worst price wipes out a real edge instantly. Star marks the best-paying book per side.
+38.9pp
best edge · CHW · DraftKings
CHC
no live price
CHW
★ bestedge +38.9pp · implied 0.0%
| Book | CHC | CHW | Best edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | +1700 | —★ | +38.9 |
Edges shown are model probability minus no-vig implied probability for that side at that book. Stars mark the highest-paying cell per side. Lines refresh every 60 seconds.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
The receipts
+1.99
CLV pp · steam
Open price
+119
Close price
+109
Open no-vig
43.7%
Close no-vig
45.7%
Market steamed in our direction · Graded: hit
Recap · MLB
hicago White Sox held off Chicago Cubs, 9–8. It came down to the final possession.
CHW +1.5 cashed (CHC lost outright). Total cleared the 9.0 OVER by 8.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Michael Conforto
RF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
3
RBI
CHW · top performer

Andrew Benintendi
DH
3-3
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
29-18
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.818 | ||||||||
| 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1-6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT2622 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9-38 | 38 | 8 | 9 | 7 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.2 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 9.1 | 12 | 9 | 8 | 3 | 9 | 2 |
CHW
24-22
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-5 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3-3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.632 | ||||||||
| 3-5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT24.12 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 12-38 | 38 | 9 | 12 | 9 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 10.0 | 9 | 8 | 6 | 9 | 6 | 2 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
CHW
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
9
Hits
12
8
Runs
9
1
Errors
1
Current series
CHW win series 2-1
Season series
CHW lead series 2-1
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
CHC -1.5
Total
9.0
High-scoring · +0.5 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 200 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
9.0
0.0 since open
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 49pp · Bottom 10th Inning
M. Conforto
RFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.850 OPS
C. Rea
SPStarting pitcher
4.2 IP · 4 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 1 BB
R. Grichuk
RFBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
E. Fedde
SPStarting pitcher
3.0 IP · 2 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 4 BB
How it ended
CHW beat CHC 9-8. Quero's play in the bottom 10th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (49pp).
Win probability
CHW vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactPeters · homered to right (359 feet), Benintendi scored and Quero scored.
Conforto · homered to center (414 feet), Bregman scored and Suzuki scored.
Quero · homered to center (407 feet), Meidroth scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
| CHW | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 9 |
Period scoring
CHC won 2 · CHW won 4
Inn 1
Busch 2
Inn 2
Quero 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Bregman 1
Benintendi 1
Inn 5
Vargas 2
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Peters 3
Inn 9
Conforto 3
Inn 10
Bregman 1
Quero 2
Play-by-play · 720 plays
·
CHC 8·CHW 9
Quero homered to center (407 feet), Meidroth scored.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 9
+49pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 9
Ryan Rolison pitches to Edgar Quero
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 9
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Cubs challenged (play at 1st), call on the field was overturned: Andrew Benintendi out on a sacrifice bunt, first baseman Michael Busch to second baseman Nico Hoerner. Chase Meidroth to 3rd.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
+10pp
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Ryan Rolison pitches to Andrew Benintendi
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Rolison relieved Palencia
·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Bottom of the 10th inning
CHC 8·CHW 7
Middle of the 10th inning
CHC 8·CHW 7
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Suzuki struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
+10pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Tyler Davis pitches to Seiya Suzuki
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Happ intentionally walked.
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
−1pp
Pitch 4 : Automatic Ball - IBB 4
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Pitch 3 : Automatic Ball - IBB 3
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Pitch 2 : Automatic Ball - IBB 2
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Pitch 1 : Automatic Ball - IBB 1
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Tyler Davis pitches to Ian Happ
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Bregman grounded out to shortstop, Swanson scored, Busch to second, Hoerner to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
−8pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 8·CHW 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
CHC 7·CHW 7
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
CHW
Home
8
Runs
9
9
Hits
12
1
Errors
1
16
TB
21
2
HR
2
9
BB
3
6
K
9
28
LOB
16
Betting line
CHC -1.5·O/U 9·CHC -132/CHW +109
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
124
projections · 80 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
38.9%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
49.4%
P(CHW win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
48.6%
P(CHW win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
50.0%
P(CHW win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.57 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 16 players in cohort