
CHC
29-16

CHW
22-22
Line movement
200 snapshots
CHW spread
+1.5
open PK · +1.5
Total
O/U 8.5
open O/U 8.5
CHW no-vig %
41.9%
open 42.8% · -0.9
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = CHW favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
CHC 10 · CHW 5 (by 5)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CHC +1pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| CHW | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Line shopping · 1 book
Same model, different prices. The same moneyline can vary 25¢ across books — taking the worst price wipes out a real edge instantly. Star marks the best-paying book per side.
+3.0pp
best edge · CHC · DraftKings
CHC
★ bestedge +3.0pp · implied 58.1%
CHW
no live price
| Book | CHC | CHW | Best edge |
|---|---|---|---|
| DraftKings | -162★ | +124 | +3.0 |
Edges shown are model probability minus no-vig implied probability for that side at that book. Stars mark the highest-paying cell per side. Lines refresh every 60 seconds.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs went into Chicago White Sox and beat them, 10–5.
CHC -1.5 cashed (won by 5). Total cleared the 8.5 OVER by 6.5.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Carson Kelly
C
5-3
AB-H
0
R
4
RBI
CHW · top performer

Miguel Vargas
3B
4-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
29-16
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-6 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.818 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3-5 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 14-41 | 41 | 10 | 14 | 9 | 0 | 6 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 5 | 3 |
CHW
22-22
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.326 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.326 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8-33 | 33 | 5 | 8 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.1 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 14 | 10 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
CHW
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
14
Hits
8
10
Runs
5
0
Errors
0
Current series
CHW win series 2-1
Season series
CHC lead series 1-0
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
CHC -1.5
1.5pt· 6.1h
Total
8.5
Standard · 0.0 vs avg
Moneyline
5· 6.1h
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 200 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
+1.5 since open
Total
8.5
0.0 since open
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 18pp · Top 7th Inning
C. Kelly
CBatter of the game
3-for-5 · 1.200 OPS
E. Cabrera
SPStarting pitcher
4.2 IP · 2 K · 3 ER · 3 H · 3 BB
M. Vargas
3BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
S. Burke
SPStarting pitcher
4.1 IP · 5 K · 4 ER · 8 H · 1 BB
How it ended
CHC beat CHW 10-5. Kelly's play in the top 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
CHW vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactMontgomery · homered to right center (381 feet).
Vargas · homered to right (348 feet).
Kelly · reached on infield single to third, Bregman scored, Shaw to second, Suzuki to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| CHW | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
Period scoring
CHC won 4 · CHW won 3
Inn 1
Happ 1
Inn 2
Montgomery 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Kelly 1
Inn 5
Busch 1
Peters 1
Inn 6
Vargas 1
Inn 7
Kelly 1
Inn 8
Kelly 2
Inn 9
Kelenic 1
Play-by-play · 668 plays
End of the 9th inning
CHC 10·CHW 5
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Antonacci grounded into double play, second to shortstop to first, Romo out at second.
· ·
CHC 10·CHW 5
−0.8pp
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 6 : Ball 3
· ·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Javier Assad pitches to Sam Antonacci
· ·
CHC 10·CHW 5
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Romo singled to right.
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
+0.5pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Javier Assad pitches to Drew Romo
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Peters flied out to center.
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Javier Assad pitches to Tristan Peters
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Kelenic homered to center (446 feet).
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 10·CHW 4
Javier Assad pitches to Jarred Kelenic
·
CHC 10·CHW 5
Bottom of the 9th inning
CHC 10·CHW 4
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
CHW
Home
10
Runs
5
14
Hits
8
0
Errors
0
18
TB
19
0
HR
3
6
BB
4
9
K
5
19
LOB
17
Betting line
CHC -1.5·O/U 8.5·CHC -126/CHW +104
The receipts
+0.07
CLV pp
Open price
+123
Close price
+123
Open no-vig
42.8%
Close no-vig
42.9%
Line barely moved · Graded: miss
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 15 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
124
projections · 80 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
38.9%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
48.8%
P(CHW win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
48.9%
P(CHW win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
49.4%
P(CHW win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.26 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.