
CHW
1-4

MIA
4-1
Line movement
7 snapshots
MIA spread
-1.5
open -1.5
Total
O/U 8.0
open O/U 8.0
MIA no-vig %
58.3%
open 58.3%
Stepped lines reflect captured market snapshots from odds_snapshots. Spread sign convention: negative = MIA favored. Live mode caps the in-game branch to the last 60 minutes.
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
CHW 2 · MIA 9 (by 7)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIA +11pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 9 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins held off Chicago White Sox, 9–2. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
MIA -1.5 cashed (won by 7). Total cleared the 8.0 OVER by 3.0.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHW · top performer

Edgar Quero
C
2-1
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MIA · top performer

Griffin Conine
LF
4-2
AB-H
2
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHW
1-4
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.632 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.12 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT29.597 | ||||||||
| Team | 5-32 | 32 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 13 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 6 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 9 | 9 | 7 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
MIA
4-1
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.614 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 9-30 | 30 | 9 | 9 | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.1 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 13 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHW
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
5
Hits
9
2
Runs
9
3
Errors
0
Current series
MIA wins series 2-1
Season series
Series tied 1-1
Vegas line center
DraftKings via ESPN · 21+
Spread
MIA -1.5
Total
8.0
Defensive · -0.5 vs avg
Moneyline
Implied probabilities back-computed from American odds — break-even win % a moneyline bet needs to be +EV.
Line movement · 7 snapshots
ESPN-tracked · 21+
Spread
1.5
0.0 since open
Total
8.0
0.0 since open
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 16pp · Top 3rd Inning
E. Quero
CBatter of the game
1-for-2 · 1 R · 1.167 OPS
E. Fedde
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 4 K · 3 ER · 6 H · 1 BB
G. Conine
LFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
J. Junk
SPStarting pitcher
4.1 IP · 5 K · 2 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
How it ended
MIA beat CHW 9-2.
Win probability
MIA vs CHW
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactMurakami · singled to center, Quero scored, Acuña to third.
Ram · írez doubled to center, Edwards to third.
Caissie · singled to center, Hicks scored on error, Caissie safe at second on throwing error by center fielder Acuña.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIA | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | — | 9 |
Period scoring
CHW won 1 · MIA won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Murakami 1
Inn 4
Hicks 2
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Pauley 1
Inn 8
Conine 2
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 538 plays
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Peters struck out swinging.
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pete Fairbanks pitches to Tristan Peters
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Hays struck out swinging.
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pete Fairbanks pitches to Austin Hays
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Vargas struck out swinging.
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pete Fairbanks pitches to Miguel Vargas
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Fairbanks relieved Faucher
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Top of the 9th inning
CHW 2·MIA 9
End of the 8th inning
CHW 2·MIA 9
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pauley fouled out to right.
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 2·MIA 9
Team stats
CHW
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
2
Runs
9
5
Hits
9
3
Errors
0
6
TB
14
0
HR
1
2
BB
3
13
K
5
12
LOB
7
Betting line
MIA -1.5·O/U 8·CHW +129/MIA -156
The receipts
0.00
CLV pp
Open price
-156
Close price
-156
Open no-vig
58.3%
Close no-vig
58.3%
Line barely moved · Graded: hit
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 16 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 84 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
62.6%
ensemble · MIA favored
Elo Static
61.0%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
61.7%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
60.9%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.36 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs