
LAD
93-69

TOR
94-68
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
LAD wins
LAD 3 · TOR 1 (by 2)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked TOR +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| TOR | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
os Angeles Dodgers went into Toronto Blue Jays and beat them, 3–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
LAD · top performer

Shohei Ohtani
SP
3-1
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
TOR · top performer

George Springer
DH
4-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


LAD
93-69
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT24.74 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 4-31 | 31 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 0 |
TOR
94-68
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.920 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 8-33 | 33 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 8 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantLAD
TOR
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
Hits
8
3
Runs
1
1
Errors
0
Playoff series
Series tied 3-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 27pp · Bottom 9th Inning
S. Ohtani
SPBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 R · 0.833 OPS
Y. Yamamoto
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 6 K · 1 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
G. Springer
DHBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1.000 OPS
K. Gausman
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 8 K · 3 ER · 3 H · 2 BB
How it ended
LAD beat TOR 3-1. Gim's play in the bottom 9th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (27pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
TOR vs LAD
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactBetts · singled to left, Ohtani scored and Smith scored, Freeman to second.
Bichette · fouled out to shortstop.
Gim · énez lined into double play, left to second, Barger doubled off second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| TOR | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Period scoring
LAD won 1 · TOR won 0
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Betts 2
Springer 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 556 plays
End of the 9th inning
LAD 3·TOR 1
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Giménez lined into double play, left to second, Barger doubled off second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
−27pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Tyler Glasnow pitches to Andres Gimenez
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Clement popped out to first.BIG MOMENT
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
−16pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Tyler Glasnow pitches to Ernie Clement
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Glasnow relieved Sasaki
·
LAD 3·TOR 1
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Barger hit a ground rule double, Straw to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
+25pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Roki Sasaki pitches to Addison Barger
· ·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Straw ran for Kirk
·
LAD 3·TOR 1
·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Kirk hit by pitch.BIG MOMENT
·
LAD 3·TOR 1
+9pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Roki Sasaki pitches to Alejandro Kirk
·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Dean in center field.
LAD 3·TOR 1
Bottom of the 9th inning
LAD 3·TOR 1
Middle of the 9th inning
LAD 3·TOR 1
·
LAD 3·TOR 1
Team stats
LAD
Away
Stat
TOR
Home
3
Runs
1
4
Hits
8
1
Errors
0
7
TB
12
0
HR
0
4
BB
2
12
K
8
8
LOB
18
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
3 of 12 players in cohortHistorical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
119
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
52.2%
ensemble · TOR favored
Elo Static
53.8%
P(TOR win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
52.0%
P(TOR win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
54.2%
P(TOR win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.96 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
94% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.