
LAD
93-69

MIL
97-65
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
LAD wins
LAD 2 · MIL 1 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIL +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
os Angeles Dodgers went into Milwaukee Brewers and beat them, 2–1. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
LAD · top performer

Freddie Freeman
1B
5-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MIL · top performer

Jake Bauers
1B
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


LAD
93-69
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2-5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT24.74 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-31 | 31 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 4 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 8.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 11 | 0 |
MIL
97-65
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| Team | 2-27 | 27 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 11 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 4.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 8 | 4 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantLAD
No arsenal data yet for this team’s pitchers.
MIL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
2
2
Runs
1
0
Errors
0
Playoff series
LAD lead series 1-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 29pp · Bottom 9th Inning
F. Freeman
1BBatter of the game
2-for-5 · 1 HR · 1.400 OPS
B. Snell
SPStarting pitcherGem
8.0 IP · 10 K · 0 ER · 1 H
J. Bauers
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
Q. Priester
SPTop reliever
4.0 IP · 1 K · 0 ER · 3 H · 3 BB
How it ended
LAD beat MIL 2-1. Turang's play in the bottom 9th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (29pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
MIL vs LAD
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactFreeman · homered to right (362 feet).
Bauers · hit a ground rule double, Collins to third.
Turang · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Period scoring
LAD won 1 · MIL won 0
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Freeman 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Betts 1
Chourio 1
Play-by-play · 570 plays
End of the 9th inning
LAD 2·MIL 1
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Turang struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
−29pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Blake Treinen pitches to Brice Turang
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Contreras walked.BIG MOMENT
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
+6pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Yelich stole second.
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Yelich stole second.
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Blake Treinen pitches to William Contreras
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Treinen relieved Sasaki
·
LAD 2·MIL 1
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Yelich walked.
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
+5pp
Pitch 7 : Ball 4
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
LAD 2·MIL 1
Team stats
LAD
Away
Stat
MIL
Home
2
Runs
1
7
Hits
2
0
Errors
0
12
TB
3
1
HR
0
8
BB
3
4
K
11
23
LOB
4
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 11 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
124
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
51.6%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
53.6%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
51.0%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
54.0%
P(MIL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.33 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
91% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.