
PHI
96-66

LAD
93-69
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
LAD wins
PHI 1 · LAD 2 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked LAD +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| LAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
os Angeles Dodgers held off Philadelphia Phillies, 2–1. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PHI · top performer

Alec Bohm
3B
3-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
LAD · top performer

Alex Call
LF
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


PHI
96-66
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.818 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.632 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 4-37 | 37 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 10.2 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 0 |
LAD
93-69
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT24.74 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-40 | 40 | 2 | 7 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 8 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 3.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 11.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 12 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPHI
LAD
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
Hits
7
1
Runs
2
2
Errors
1
Playoff series
LAD win series 3-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 36pp · Bottom 11th Inning
A. Bohm
3BBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 0.933 OPS
C. Sanchez
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.1 IP · 5 K · 1 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
A. Call
LFBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
T. Glasnow
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 8 K · 0 ER · 2 H · 3 BB
How it ended
LAD beat PHI 2-1. Kim's play in the bottom 11th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (36pp).
Win probability
LAD vs PHI
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactCastellanos · doubled to left, Kepler scored.
Betts · walked, Dean scored, Ohtani to second, E. Hernández to third.
Kim · scored on error, Pages safe at first on fielding error by pitcher Kerkering, E. Hernández to second, Muncy to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| LAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Period scoring
PHI won 0 · LAD won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Castellanos 1
Betts 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Inn 10
Inn 11
Kim 1
Play-by-play · 663 plays
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 2
Kim scored on error, Pages safe at first on fielding error by pitcher Kerkering, E. Hernández to second, Muncy to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 2
+36pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Orion Kerkering pitches to Andy Pages
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 2
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
E. Hernández walked.
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
+1pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Muncy to second on fielder's indifference.
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Muncy to second on fielder's indifference.
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Orion Kerkering pitches to Enrique Hernandez
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Kerkering relieved Luzardo
·
PHI 1·LAD 1
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Muncy singled to center, Kim to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
+6pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Jesus Luzardo pitches to Max Muncy
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Smith lined out to center.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
−8pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Jesus Luzardo pitches to Will Smith
· ·
PHI 1·LAD 1
Team stats
PHI
Away
Stat
LAD
Home
1
Runs
2
4
Hits
7
2
Errors
1
6
TB
7
0
HR
0
4
BB
4
12
K
12
14
LOB
21
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
119
projections · 79 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
53.6%
ensemble · LAD favored
Elo Static
53.9%
P(LAD win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
54.6%
P(LAD win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
54.6%
P(LAD win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.33 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs