
CHC
92-70

MIL
97-65
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIL wins
CHC 1 · MIL 3 (by 2)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIL +7pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MIL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
ilwaukee Brewers held off Chicago Cubs, 3–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Seiya Suzuki
RF
4-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MIL · top performer

Caleb Durbin
3B
2-2
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreADVANCED


CHC
92-70
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 4-31 | 31 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2.2 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
MIL
97-65
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.96 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.790 | ||||||||
| 2-2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 6-29 | 29 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 4.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
Hits
6
1
Runs
3
2
Errors
0
Playoff series
MIL wins series 3-2
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 13pp · Bottom 4th Inning
S. Suzuki
RFBatter of the game
1-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.250 OPS
C. Rea
SPTop reliever
2.2 IP · 2 K · 1 ER · 4 H · 1 BB
C. Durbin
3BBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-2 · 2.000 OPS
J. Misiorowski
SPTop reliever
4.0 IP · 3 K · 1 ER · 3 H
How it ended
MIL beat CHC 3-1.
Win probability
MIL vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactSuzuki · homered to right center (390 feet).
Vaughn · homered to left (383 feet).
Busch · singled to center.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MIL | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 3 |
Period scoring
CHC won 1 · MIL won 3
Inn 1
Contreras 1
Inn 2
Suzuki 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Vaughn 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Turang 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 495 plays
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Kelly grounded out to shortstop.
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
+1pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Abner Uribe pitches to Carson Kelly
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Happ lined out to right.
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
+2pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Abner Uribe pitches to Ian Happ
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Suzuki flied out to left.
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
+3pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Abner Uribe pitches to Seiya Suzuki
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Top of the 9th inning
CHC 1·MIL 3
End of the 8th inning
CHC 1·MIL 3
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Frelick lined out to center.
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Brad Keller pitches to Sal Frelick
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Vaughn grounded out to shortstop.
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
−0.5pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Brad Keller pitches to Andrew Vaughn
·
CHC 1·MIL 3
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
MIL
Home
1
Runs
3
4
Hits
6
2
Errors
0
7
TB
15
1
HR
3
1
BB
4
8
K
4
11
LOB
9
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
56.6%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
57.0%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
56.1%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
57.3%
P(MIL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.51 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.