
MIL
97-65

CHC
92-70
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
MIL 0 · CHC 6 (by 6)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIL +2pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CHC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs held off Milwaukee Brewers, 6–0. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
MIL · top performer

Andrew Vaughn
1B
3-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
CHC · top performer

Kyle Tucker
RF
3-2
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreADVANCED


MIL
97-65
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT24.96 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.790 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 3-28 | 28 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 1 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 10 | 6 | 5 | 6 | 8 | 3 |
CHC
92-70
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 3-5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 2-3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.992 | ||||||||
| Team | 10-34 | 34 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 3 | 6 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 8 | 0 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
3
Hits
10
0
Runs
6
1
Errors
0
Playoff series
Series tied 2-2
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 25pp · Bottom 1st Inning
A. Vaughn
1BBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 0.833 OPS
F. Peralta
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 6 K · 3 ER · 3 H · 2 BB
K. Tucker
RFBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-3 · 1 HR · 2.467 OPS
M. Boyd
SPStarting pitcher
4.2 IP · 6 K · 0 ER · 2 H · 3 BB
How it ended
CHC beat MIL 6-0. Happ's play in the bottom 1st inning drove the biggest swing of the night (25pp).
Win probability
CHC vs MIL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHapp · homered to right (410 feet), Hoerner scored and Tucker scored.
Yelich · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CHC | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | — | 6 |
Period scoring
MIL won 0 · CHC won 4
Inn 1
Happ 3
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Shaw 1
Inn 7
Tucker 1
Inn 8
Busch 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 560 plays
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Durbin grounded out to shortstop.
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Caleb Thielbar pitches to Caleb Durbin
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Vaughn grounded out to shortstop.
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Caleb Thielbar pitches to Andrew Vaughn
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Turang grounded out to second.
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Caleb Thielbar pitches to Brice Turang
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Thielbar relieved Keller
·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Top of the 9th inning
MIL 0·CHC 6
End of the 8th inning
MIL 0·CHC 6
· ·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Happ grounded out to shortstop.
· ·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Robert Gasser pitches to Ian Happ
· ·
MIL 0·CHC 6
Team stats
MIL
Away
Stat
CHC
Home
0
Runs
6
3
Hits
10
1
Errors
0
4
TB
19
0
HR
3
4
BB
6
8
K
8
14
LOB
23
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.8%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
48.3%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
50.6%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
48.1%
P(CHC win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.13 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
93% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.