
CIN
83-79

LAD
93-69
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
LAD wins
CIN 5 · LAD 10 (by 5)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked LAD +9pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| LAD | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
os Angeles Dodgers held off Cincinnati Reds, 10–5.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CIN · top performer

Gavin Lux
LF
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
LAD · top performer

Teoscar Hernandez
LF
5-3
AB-H
2
R
4
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CIN
83-79
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.735 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-34 | 34 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 0 | 5 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.0 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 3 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | |
| 1.1 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 15 | 10 | 9 | 3 | 12 | 5 |
LAD
93-69
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.74 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 3-5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 15-38 | 38 | 10 | 15 | 9 | 5 | 3 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 12 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCIN
No arsenal data yet for this team’s pitchers.
LAD
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
15
5
Runs
10
1
Errors
0
Playoff series
LAD lead series 1-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 14pp · Bottom 3rd Inning
G. Lux
LFBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
H. Greene
SPStarting pitcher
3.0 IP · 4 K · 5 ER · 6 H · 2 BB
T. Hernández
LFBatter of the game2-HR game
3-for-5 · 2 HR · 2.400 OPS
B. Snell
SPStarting pitcher
7.0 IP · 9 K · 2 ER · 4 H · 1 BB
How it ended
LAD beat CIN 10-5.
Win probability
LAD vs CIN
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactOhtani · homered to right (375 feet).
T. Hern · ández homered to left (390 feet), Freeman scored and Muncy scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 5 |
| LAD | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | — | 10 |
Period scoring
CIN won 1 · LAD won 4
Inn 1
Ohtani 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Hern 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Hern 1
Inn 6
Ohtani 2
Inn 7
Cruz 1
Call 1
Inn 8
Stewart 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 643 plays
· ·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Andujar grounded out to third.
· ·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Lux to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Lux to second on fielder's indifference.
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Blake Treinen pitches to Miguel Andujar
· ·
CIN 5·LAD 10
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Lux reached on infield single to shortstop.
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Blake Treinen pitches to Gavin Lux
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Lux hit for Marte
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Friedl struck out swinging.
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Blake Treinen pitches to TJ Friedl
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
McLain struck out looking.
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CIN 5·LAD 10
Team stats
CIN
Away
Stat
LAD
Home
5
Runs
10
7
Hits
15
1
Errors
0
9
TB
31
0
HR
5
5
BB
3
12
K
12
12
LOB
17
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
119
projections · 78 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
61.0%
ensemble · LAD favored
Elo Static
59.2%
P(LAD win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
63.7%
P(LAD win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
58.2%
P(LAD win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
2.39 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
84% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.