
CIN
83-79

LAD
93-69
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
LAD wins
CIN 4 · LAD 8 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked LAD +10pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| LAD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 8 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
os Angeles Dodgers held off Cincinnati Reds, 8–4.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CIN · top performer

Sal Stewart
1B
4-2
AB-H
0
R
3
RBI
LAD · top performer

Mookie Betts
SS
5-4
AB-H
1
R
3
RBI
MLB · Box scoreADVANCED


CIN
83-79
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 6-33 | 33 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 13 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.1 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 13 | 8 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 0 |
LAD
93-69
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 4-5 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 2-3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 13-37 | 37 | 8 | 13 | 8 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 9 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 13 | 0 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
13
4
Runs
8
1
Errors
3
Playoff series
LAD win series 2-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 18pp · Top 1st Inning
S. Stewart
1BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1.000 OPS
Z. Littell
SPStarting pitcher
3.1 IP · 2 K · 3 ER · 6 H
M. Betts
SSBatter of the game
4-for-5 · 1 R · 1.600 OPS
Y. Yamamoto
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.2 IP · 9 K · 0 ER · 4 H · 2 BB
How it ended
LAD beat CIN 8-4. Stewart's play in the top 1st inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Win probability
LAD vs CIN
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactStewart · singled to right, Lux scored and Hays scored.
E. Hern · ández doubled to center, Muncy scored.
Lux · reached on infield single to third, Steer to second, Friedl to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
| LAD | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | — | 8 |
Period scoring
CIN won 2 · LAD won 4
Inn 1
Stewart 2
Inn 2
Inn 3
Betts 1
Inn 4
Hern 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Hern 2
Inn 7
Betts 1
Inn 8
Stewart 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 606 plays
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Hays lined out to shortstop.
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Hays continues to at bat after dropped foul ball by catcher Rortvedt.
· ·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Hays continues to at bat after dropped foul ball by catcher Rortvedt.
· ·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Roki Sasaki pitches to Austin Hays
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Lux struck out swinging.
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
+0.5pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Roki Sasaki pitches to Gavin Lux
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Steer struck out swinging.
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
+0.7pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Roki Sasaki pitches to Spencer Steer
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Sasaki relieved Vesia
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Top of the 9th inning
CIN 4·LAD 8
End of the 8th inning
CIN 4·LAD 8
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
E. Hernández grounded out to third.
· ·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Chase Burns pitches to Enrique Hernandez
· ·
CIN 4·LAD 8
Team stats
CIN
Away
Stat
LAD
Home
4
Runs
8
6
Hits
13
1
Errors
3
6
TB
19
0
HR
0
5
BB
3
13
K
3
20
LOB
25
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
119
projections · 78 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
62.5%
ensemble · LAD favored
Elo Static
60.3%
P(LAD win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
64.8%
P(LAD win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
59.4%
P(LAD win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
2.36 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
84% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.