
CIN
83-79

MIL
97-65
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIL wins
CIN 2 · MIL 4 (by 2)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIL +10pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
ilwaukee Brewers held off Cincinnati Reds, 4–2.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CIN · top performer

TJ Friedl
CF
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MIL · top performer

Danny Jansen
C
3-2
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CIN
83-79
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.992 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 5-31 | 31 | 2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.1 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 12 | 1 |
MIL
97-65
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 7-31 | 31 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 6 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 2.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 2 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCIN
MIL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
5
Hits
7
2
Runs
4
0
Errors
0
Current series
MIL wins series 4-3
Season series
MIL wins series 8-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 18pp · Bottom 4th Inning
T. Friedl
CFBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.833 OPS
B. Singer
SPStarting pitcher
3.1 IP · 5 K · 3 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
D. Jansen
CBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-3 · 1 HR · 2.417 OPS
F. Peralta
SPStarting pitcher
2.0 IP · 3 K · 1 ER · 3 H
How it ended
MIL beat CIN 4-2. Jansen's play in the bottom 4th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (18pp).
Win probability
MIL vs CIN
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactDe La Cruz · homered to center (413 feet).
Chourio · doubled to right.
Jansen · homered to left (382 feet), Collins scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 4 |
Period scoring
CIN won 1 · MIL won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Cruz 1
Inn 3
Friedl 1
Turang 1
Inn 4
Jansen 2
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 569 plays
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Steer flied out to center.
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
+0.9pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Abner Uribe pitches to Spencer Steer
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
De La Cruz grounded out to first.
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
+2pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Abner Uribe pitches to Elly De La Cruz
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Andujar fouled out to catcher.
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
+3pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Abner Uribe pitches to Miguel Andujar
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Uribe relieved Koenig
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Top of the 9th inning
CIN 2·MIL 4
End of the 8th inning
CIN 2·MIL 4
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Vaughn struck out swinging.
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Connor Phillips pitches to Andrew Vaughn
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
Turang struck out swinging.
·
CIN 2·MIL 4
−0.5pp
Team stats
CIN
Away
Stat
MIL
Home
2
Runs
4
5
Hits
7
0
Errors
0
12
TB
14
2
HR
1
2
BB
6
10
K
12
10
LOB
25
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 85 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
61.2%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
60.1%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
61.7%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
59.5%
P(MIL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.93 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
94% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.