
MIA
50-54

MIL
62-43
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIL wins
MIA 2 · MIL 3 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked MIL +10pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
ilwaukee Brewers held off Miami Marlins, 3–2. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
MIA · top performer

Eric Wagaman
1B
1-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MIL · top performer

Blake Perkins
CF
1-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


MIA
50-54
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT2622 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.326 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 6-31 | 31 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.1 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 9 | 0 |
MIL
62-43
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 9-34 | 34 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 6 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantMIA
MIL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
9
2
Runs
3
1
Errors
0
Current series
MIA wins series 2-1
Season series
Series tied 3-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 36pp · Bottom 8th Inning
E. Wagaman
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
E. Perez
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 6 K · 1 ER · 2 H · 2 BB
B. Perkins
CFBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 1 R · 2.000 OPS
B. Woodruff
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 6 K · 2 ER · 4 H · 3 BB
How it ended
MIL beat MIA 3-2. Vaughn's play in the bottom 8th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (36pp).
Win probability
MIL vs MIA
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactSanoja · struck out swinging.
Chourio · hit a ground rule double.
Vaughn · hit a ground rule double, Perkins scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
Period scoring
MIA won 2 · MIL won 3
Inn 1
Stowers 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Chourio 1
Inn 4
Hern 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Vaughn 1
Inn 9
Perkins 1
Play-by-play · 578 plays
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 3
Perkins singled to center, Haase scored, Chourio to second, Turang to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 3
+16pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 3
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Cade Gibson pitches to Blake Perkins
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 3
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Chourio intentionally walked.
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 4 : Automatic Ball - IBB 4
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 3 : Automatic Ball - IBB 3
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 2 : Automatic Ball - IBB 2
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 1 : Automatic Ball - IBB 1
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Cade Gibson pitches to Jackson Chourio
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Turang doubled to left, Haase to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
+18pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Cade Gibson pitches to Brice Turang
· ·
MIA 2·MIL 2
·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Haase singled to center.BIG MOMENT
·
MIA 2·MIL 2
+7pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Cade Gibson pitches to Eric Haase
·
MIA 2·MIL 2
·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Seigler struck out looking.
·
MIA 2·MIL 2
+2pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
MIA 2·MIL 2
Team stats
MIA
Away
Stat
MIL
Home
2
Runs
3
6
Hits
9
1
Errors
0
12
TB
13
1
HR
0
5
BB
4
8
K
9
15
LOB
17
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 90 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
61.7%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
60.4%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
61.6%
P(MIL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
60.4%
P(MIL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.56 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 12 players in cohort