
MIL
94-60

STL
75-79
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
STL wins
MIL 1 · STL 7 (by 6)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIL +14pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| STL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
t. Louis Cardinals held off Milwaukee Brewers, 7–1. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
MIL · top performer

Jake Bauers
1B
3-3
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
STL · top performer

Alec Burleson
1B
4-3
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


MIL
94-60
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.790 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-5 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.96 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3-3 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 12-39 | 39 | 1 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 3.2 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 4 | 6 | 0 |
STL
75-79
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.18 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3-4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT25.29 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.891 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 14-34 | 34 | 7 | 14 | 6 | 0 | 4 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 9 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 1 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 12 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 1 |
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
12
Hits
14
1
Runs
7
1
Errors
0
Current series
STL wins series 4-2
Season series
MIL leads series 6-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 10pp · Top 3rd Inning
J. Bauers
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
3-for-3 · 2.000 OPS
J. Misiorowski
SPStarting pitcher
3.2 IP · 3 K · 2 ER · 5 H · 3 BB
A. Burleson
1BBatter of the game
3-for-4 · 1 R · 1.500 OPS
S. Gray
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 7 K · 1 ER · 9 H
How it ended
STL beat MIL 7-1.
Win probability
STL vs MIL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactCollins · struck out swinging.
Frelick · homered to right (422 feet).
Arenado · doubled to left, Burleson scored on error, Donovan scored and Herrera scored, Arenado safe at third on throwing error by second baseman Turang.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MIL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| STL | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | — | 7 |
Period scoring
MIL won 1 · STL won 3
Inn 1
Nootbaar 1
Inn 2
Walker 1
Inn 3
Frelick 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Arenado 3
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 599 plays
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Jansen struck out looking.
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Ryan Fernandez pitches to Danny Jansen
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Yelich struck out swinging.
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Ryan Fernandez pitches to Christian Yelich
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Chourio reached on infield single to third, Ortiz to second.
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Ryan Fernandez pitches to Jackson Chourio
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Frelick flied out to center.
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
Ryan Fernandez pitches to Sal Frelick
· ·
MIL 1·STL 7
·
MIL 1·STL 7
Ortiz singled to right.
·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
MIL 1·STL 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
MIL 1·STL 7
Team stats
MIL
Away
Stat
STL
Home
1
Runs
7
12
Hits
14
1
Errors
0
15
TB
18
1
HR
0
1
BB
4
11
K
6
21
LOB
22
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
3 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
122
projections · 88 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.1%
ensemble · MIL favored
Elo Static
35.9%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
36.0%
P(STL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
35.2%
P(STL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.36 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.