
PHI
83-60

MIA
66-77
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
MIA wins
PHI 4 · MIA 5 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked PHI +9pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MIA | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
iami Marlins held off Philadelphia Phillies, 5–4. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PHI · top performer

Brandon Marsh
LF
3-3
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MIA · top performer

Otto Lopez
SS
4-3
AB-H
2
R
4
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


PHI
83-60
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT29.798 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.818 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 3-3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-34 | 34 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
MIA
66-77
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.765 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 3-4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 2-2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.326 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 10-34 | 34 | 5 | 10 | 5 | 2 | 4 | 4 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 2.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2.1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 7 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPHI
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
10
4
Runs
5
1
Errors
1
Current series
PHI wins series 5-2
Season series
PHI leads series 7-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 20pp · Bottom 1st Inning
B. Marsh
LFBatter of the gamePerfect day
3-for-3 · 1 R · 2.000 OPS
T. Walker
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 1 K · 4 ER · 8 H · 2 BB
O. Lopez
SSBatter of the game2-HR game
3-for-4 · 2 HR · 3.000 OPS
T. Phillips
RPStarting pitcher
2.2 IP · 3 K · 1 ER · 1 H · 1 BB
How it ended
MIA beat PHI 5-4. Lopez's play in the bottom 1st inning drove the biggest swing of the night (20pp).
Win probability
MIA vs PHI
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactLopez · homered to left (424 feet), Marsee scored and Ramírez scored.
Lopez · homered to center (417 feet).
Harper · grounded out to second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| MIA | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | 5 |
Period scoring
PHI won 2 · MIA won 2
Inn 1
Lopez 3
Inn 2
Castellanos 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Turner 1
Inn 7
Lopez 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Schwarber 1
Play-by-play · 595 plays
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
Harper grounded out to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
+17pp
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
Lake Bachar pitches to Bryce Harper
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
Schwarber singled to right, Kepler scored, Realmuto to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
−9pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 3
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Lake Bachar pitches to Kyle Schwarber
· ·
PHI 4·MIA 5
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Bader lined out to first.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
+9pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Lake Bachar pitches to Harrison Bader
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Bader hit for Sosa
·
PHI 3·MIA 5
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Stott fouled out to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
+9pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Lake Bachar pitches to Bryson Stott
· ·
PHI 3·MIA 5
Team stats
PHI
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
4
Runs
5
7
Hits
10
1
Errors
1
14
TB
16
1
HR
2
5
BB
4
7
K
4
17
LOB
17
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 16 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 81 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.4%
ensemble · PHI favored
Elo Static
41.2%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
42.8%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
42.0%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.65 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.