
CHC
86-64

PIT
65-86
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
CHC 4 · PIT 0 (by 4)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CHC +5pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs went into Pittsburgh Pirates and beat them, 4–0.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Pete Crow-Armstrong
CF
4-2
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
PIT · top performer

Bryan Reynolds
LF
2-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
86-64
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT29.294 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9-35 | 35 | 4 | 9 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 | 0 |
PIT
65-86
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.85 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.969 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 3-30 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 1 | |
| 1.2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 9 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 2 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
PIT
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
9
Hits
3
4
Runs
0
0
Errors
0
Current series
CHC win series 5-1
Season series
CHC lead series 8-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 6pp · Top 4th Inning
P. Crow-Armstrong
CFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
J. Taillon
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 3 K · 0 ER · 2 H · 2 BB
B. Reynolds
LFBatter of the game
1-for-2 · 1.167 OPS
B. Ashcraft
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 4 K · 3 ER · 6 H · 2 BB
How it ended
CHC beat PIT 4-0.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
PIT vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactCrow-Armstrong · doubled to center.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| PIT | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Period scoring
CHC won 3 · PIT won 0
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Busch 1
Inn 4
Swanson 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Crow-Armstrong 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 596 plays
End of the 9th inning
CHC 4·PIT 0
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Triolo struck out swinging.
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
−4pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Brad Keller pitches to Jared Triolo
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Keller relieved Hodge
·
CHC 4·PIT 0
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Yorke walked.
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
+3pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Porter Hodge pitches to Nick Yorke
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Cruz grounded out to third, Suwinski to second, N. Gonzales to third.
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
−2pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Porter Hodge pitches to Oneil Cruz
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Cruz hit for Bart
·
CHC 4·PIT 0
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
Suwinski walked, N. Gonzales to second.
· ·
CHC 4·PIT 0
+2pp
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
PIT
Home
4
Runs
0
9
Hits
3
0
Errors
0
17
TB
4
2
HR
0
3
BB
6
6
K
6
16
LOB
14
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 79 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.5%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
44.9%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
46.0%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
45.3%
P(PIT win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.45 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
97% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs