
CHC
81-63

ATL
65-79
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
ATL wins
CHC 1 · ATL 4 (by 3)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHC +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| ATL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
tlanta Braves held off Chicago Cubs, 4–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Dansby Swanson
SS
3-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
ATL · top performer

Matt Olson
1B
4-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
81-63
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.969 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 5-31 | 31 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 1 | |
| 2.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 2 |
ATL
65-79
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.632 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-31 | 31 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 8 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
ATL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
5
Hits
7
1
Runs
4
0
Errors
0
Current series
CHC win series 2-1
Season series
Series tied 2-2
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 11pp · Bottom 1st Inning
D. Swanson
SSBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 0.667 OPS
S. Imanaga
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 4 K · 3 ER · 5 H
M. Olson
1BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
B. Elder
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.1 IP · 6 K · 1 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
How it ended
ATL beat CHC 4-1.
Win probability
ATL vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactBaldwin · doubled to center, Kim scored.
Crow-Armstrong · grounded out to first.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| ATL | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | 4 |
Period scoring
CHC won 1 · ATL won 2
Inn 1
Albies 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Shaw 1
Inn 8
Olson 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 476 plays
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Castro struck out looking.
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Willi Castro
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Hoerner grounded out to third.
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
+0.9pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Nico Hoerner
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Crow-Armstrong lined out to right.
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
+2pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Pete Crow-Armstrong
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Iglesias relieved Kinley
·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Top of the 9th inning
CHC 1·ATL 4
End of the 8th inning
CHC 1·ATL 4
· ·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Baldwin flied out to right.
· ·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 1·ATL 4
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
ATL
Home
1
Runs
4
5
Hits
7
0
Errors
0
6
TB
14
0
HR
2
1
BB
0
8
K
5
6
LOB
7
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
3 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 75 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.5%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
46.1%
P(ATL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
44.2%
P(ATL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
47.0%
P(ATL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.17 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
92% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs