
CHC
83-63

ATL
65-81
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
CHC 3 · ATL 2 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CHC +4pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| ATL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs went into Atlanta Braves and beat them, 3–2. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Carson Kelly
C
5-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
ATL · top performer

Matt Olson
1B
1-1
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
83-63
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 3-5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 11-36 | 36 | 3 | 11 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 13 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 7 | 0 |
ATL
65-81
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.614 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 7-31 | 31 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 7 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 7 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 9 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 13 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
ATL
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
7
3
Runs
2
0
Errors
1
Current series
CHC win series 2-1
Season series
CHC win series 4-2
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 16pp · Top 4th Inning
C. Kelly
CBatter of the game
2-for-5 · 1 HR · 1.400 OPS
J. Taillon
SPStarting pitcher
4.1 IP · 2 K · 2 ER · 6 H · 2 BB
M. Olson
1BBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 2.000 OPS
C. Sale
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 9 K · 3 ER · 7 H · 1 BB
How it ended
CHC beat ATL 3-2.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactKelly · homered to left (369 feet).
Turner · doubled to left, Swanson scored.
Crow-Armstrong · walked.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| ATL | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
ATL
Home
3
Runs
2
11
Hits
7
0
Errors
1
15
TB
10
1
HR
0
3
BB
2
13
K
7
20
LOB
12
Win probability
ATL vs CHC
Period scoring
CHC won 1 · ATL won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Jr. 1
Inn 4
Kelly 1
Inn 5
Suzuki 1
Olson 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 589 plays
End of the 9th inning
CHC 3·ATL 2
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Harris II grounded out to third.
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
−5pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Andrew Kittredge pitches to Michael Harris II
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Albies grounded out to first.BIG MOMENT
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
−7pp
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Andrew Kittredge pitches to Ozzie Albies
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Kim struck out swinging.
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
−5pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Andrew Kittredge pitches to Ha-Seong Kim
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Kittredge relieved Keller
·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Bottom of the 9th inning
CHC 3·ATL 2
Middle of the 9th inning
CHC 3·ATL 2
· ·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Kelly flied out to right.
· ·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 3·ATL 2
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 3·ATL 2
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
1 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
126
projections · 75 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.5%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
46.1%
P(ATL win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
47.4%
P(ATL win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
47.1%
P(ATL win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.55 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.