
CHW
57-92

CLE
77-71
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CLE wins
CHW 1 · CLE 3 (by 2)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CLE +10pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CLE | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
leveland Guardians held off Chicago White Sox, 3–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHW · top performer

Michael A. Taylor
RF
2-2
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
CLE · top performer

Jhonkensy Noel
RF
1-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHW
57-92
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.12 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2-2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 8-33 | 33 | 1 | 8 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 |
CLE
77-71
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.411 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 6-30 | 30 | 3 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 9 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHW
CLE
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
6
1
Runs
3
0
Errors
0
Current series
CLE wins series 6-0
Season series
CLE leads series 10-2
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 19pp · Bottom 2nd Inning
M. Taylor
RFBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-2 · 2.000 OPS
D. Martin
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 3 K · 2 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
J. Noel
RFBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 1 HR · 5.000 OPS
P. Messick
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 4 K · 1 ER · 7 H · 1 BB
How it ended
CLE beat CHW 3-1. Kayfus's play in the bottom 2nd inning drove the biggest swing of the night (19pp).
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactSosa · singled to left, Meidroth scored, Quero to second.
Kayfus · homered to right (358 feet), Naylor scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHW | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| CLE | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | — | 3 |
Team stats
CHW
Away
Stat
CLE
Home
1
Runs
3
8
Hits
6
0
Errors
0
9
TB
12
0
HR
2
1
BB
1
9
K
6
10
LOB
8
Win probability
CLE vs CHW
Period scoring
CHW won 1 · CLE won 2
Inn 1
Sosa 1
Inn 2
Kayfus 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Noel 1
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 492 plays
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Benintendi flied out to center.
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
+0.7pp
Pitch 7 : Ball In Play
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Cade Smith pitches to Andrew Benintendi
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Vargas struck out swinging.
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
+2pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Looking
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Cade Smith pitches to Miguel Vargas
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Tauchman struck out swinging.
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
+3pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Cade Smith pitches to Mike Tauchman
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Smith relieved Gaddis
·
CHW 1·CLE 3
Noel in right field.
CHW 1·CLE 3
Top of the 9th inning
CHW 1·CLE 3
End of the 8th inning
CHW 1·CLE 3
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
1 of 13 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
121
projections · 80 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
61.8%
ensemble · CLE favored
Elo Static
60.4%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
62.0%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
59.4%
P(CLE win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.07 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
93% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs