
LAD
82-65

SF
75-72
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
LAD
league avg
SF
.788
OPS
.717
.725
.346
OBP
.319
.309
5.36
Runs / G
4.50
4.11
3.37
Team ERA
4.18
4.52
1.09
WHIP
1.31
1.40
9.1
K / 9
8.5
8.1
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
SF wins
LAD 1 · SF 5 (by 4)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked LAD +0pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SF | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
an Francisco Giants held off Los Angeles Dodgers, 5–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
LAD · top performer

Michael Conforto
DH
4-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
SF · top performer

Patrick Bailey
C
4-1
AB-H
1
R
4
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .279 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| .258 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .291 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .253 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .241 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .193 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .271 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .225 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .294 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .262 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 33 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 10 | 91 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 19 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | |
| 0.0 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 9 | |
| Team | 9.1 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 13 | 126 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .263 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .248 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .229 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .284 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .240 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .267 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .242 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .220 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| .224 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .240 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .258 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .219 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .100 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 31 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 | 105 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 17 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | |
| Team | 10.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 5 | 139 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantLAD
SF
No arsenal data yet for this team’s pitchers.
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
Hits
3
1
Runs
5
2
Errors
0
Current series
LAD win series 4-2
Season series
LAD lead series 4-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 38pp · Top 10th Inning
M. Conforto
DHBatter of the game
1-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.250 OPS
Y. Yamamoto
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
7.0 IP · 10 K · 1 ER · 1 H · 1 BB
P. Bailey
CBatter of the game
1-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.250 OPS
J. Verlander
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
7.0 IP · 4 K · 1 ER · 4 H · 4 BB
How it ended
SF beat LAD 5-1. Ohtani's play in the top 10th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (38pp).
Win probability
SF vs LAD
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactConforto · homered to center (400 feet).
Ohtani · intentionally walked.
Bailey · homered to left center (388 feet), Koss scored, Lee scored and Schmitt scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| SF | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
Period scoring
LAD won 1 · SF won 2
Inn 1
Adames 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Conforto 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Inn 10
Bailey 4
Play-by-play · 555 plays
·
LAD 1·SF 5
Bailey homered to left center (388 feet), Koss scored, Lee scored and Schmitt scored.BIG MOMENT
· ·
LAD 1·SF 5
+19pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
LAD 1·SF 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Tanner Scott pitches to Patrick Bailey
· ·
LAD 1·SF 5
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Schmitt intentionally walked, Lee to second.
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 4 : Automatic Ball - IBB 4
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 3 : Automatic Ball - IBB 3
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 2 : Automatic Ball - IBB 2
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 1 : Automatic Ball - IBB 1
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Tanner Scott pitches to Casey Schmitt
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Lee walked.
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 7 : Ball 4
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Tanner Scott pitches to Jung Hoo Lee
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Scott relieved Treinen
·
LAD 1·SF 1
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Chapman grounded out to second, Koss to third.
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
+1pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
LAD 1·SF 1
Team stats
LAD
Away
Stat
SF
Home
1
Runs
5
4
Hits
3
2
Errors
0
8
TB
7
1
HR
1
5
BB
4
5
K
13
17
LOB
7
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 80 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
44.8%
ensemble · LAD favored
Elo Static
49.7%
P(SF win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
48.1%
P(SF win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
50.2%
P(SF win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.89 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
94% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.