
NYM
76-70

PHI
86-60
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PHI wins
NYM 3 · PHI 11 (by 8)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked PHI +12pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| PHI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 11 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
hiladelphia Phillies held off New York Mets, 11–3. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
NYM · top performer

Hayden Senger
C
1-1
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
PHI · top performer

Max Kepler
LF
4-3
AB-H
1
R
5
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


NYM
76-70
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3-5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.513 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.29 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.411 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.735 | ||||||||
| Team | 9-35 | 35 | 3 | 9 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 14 | 11 | 11 | 4 | 12 | 2 |
PHI
86-60
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 3-5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 3-4 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 14-37 | 37 | 11 | 14 | 11 | 2 | 4 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 9 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantNYM
PHI
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
9
Hits
14
3
Runs
11
0
Errors
0
Current series
PHI wins series 6-1
Season series
NYM lead series 7-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 10pp · Bottom 5th Inning
H. Senger
CBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 1 R · 2.000 OPS
C. Holmes
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 5 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 3 BB
M. Kepler
LFBatter of the gamePerfect day
3-for-4 · 1 HR · 2.250 OPS
C. Sanchez
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 6 K · 1 ER · 4 H · 1 BB
How it ended
PHI beat NYM 11-3.
Win probability
PHI vs NYM
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactJ. Soto · doubled.
Walton · grounded out to pitcher.
Marsh · doubled to right, Realmuto scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NYM | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| PHI | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 2 | — | 11 |
Period scoring
NYM won 1 · PHI won 5
Inn 1
Realmuto 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Marte 1
Inn 5
Marsh 1
Inn 6
Kepler 2
Inn 7
Harper 1
Inn 8
Soto 1
Kepler 1
Inn 9
Baty 1
Play-by-play · 615 plays
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
J. Soto flied out to center.
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Lou Trivino pitches to Juan Soto
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Mauricio walked, Baty to second.
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Pitch 4 : Ball 4
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Pitch 3 : Ball 3
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Lou Trivino pitches to Ronny Mauricio
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Baty singled to center, Senger scored, Mullins to third.
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Pitch 8 : Ball In Play
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
Pitch 7 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Pitch 6 : Ball 3
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Lou Trivino pitches to Brett Baty
· ·
NYM 3·PHI 11
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Mullins singled to right, Senger to second.
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Lou Trivino pitches to Cedric Mullins
· ·
NYM 2·PHI 11
·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Senger singled to right.
·
NYM 2·PHI 11
Team stats
NYM
Away
Stat
PHI
Home
3
Runs
11
9
Hits
14
0
Errors
0
13
TB
22
1
HR
2
3
BB
4
9
K
12
13
LOB
26
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
3 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
118
projections · 72 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
64.2%
ensemble · PHI favored
Elo Static
62.4%
P(PHI win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
63.6%
P(PHI win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
62.4%
P(PHI win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.56 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.