
WSH
59-84

MIA
66-78
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
WSH wins
WSH 15 · MIA 7 (by 8)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked MIA +8pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSH | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 15 |
| MIA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
ashington Nationals went into Miami Marlins and beat them, 15–7. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
WSH · top performer

Josh Bell
DH
6-4
AB-H
3
R
6
RBI
MIA · top performer

Jakob Marsee
CF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


WSH
59-84
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-5 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 3-5 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 4-6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.18 | ||||||||
| 1-5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.735 | ||||||||
| 2-5 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 3-5 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 19-45 | 45 | 15 | 19 | 15 | 4 | 4 | 6 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 2 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 7 | 7 | 6 | 4 | 2 |
MIA
66-78
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.765 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 10-36 | 36 | 7 | 10 | 7 | 2 | 6 | 4 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.1 | 8 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | |
| 3.1 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 19 | 15 | 15 | 4 | 6 | 4 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantWSH
MIA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
19
Hits
10
15
Runs
7
0
Errors
0
Current series
MIA wins series 4-3
Season series
Series tied 5-5
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 14pp · Top 4th Inning
J. Bell
DHBatter of the game2-HR game
4-for-6 · 2 HR · 2.333 OPS
C. Cavalli
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 1 K · 2 ER · 6 H · 1 BB
J. Marsee
CFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.850 OPS
J. Junk
SPStarting pitcher
4.1 IP · 3 K · 6 ER · 8 H · 2 BB
How it ended
WSH beat MIA 15-7.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
MIA vs WSH
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactGarc · ía Jr. homered to right (413 feet).
Crews · doubled to center, García Jr. scored, Adams to third.
Bell · singled to right, Abrams scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WSH | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 15 |
| MIA | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 7 |
Period scoring
WSH won 5 · MIA won 1
Inn 1
Inn 2
Garc 1
Hern 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Crews 1
Inn 5
Crews 3
Edwards 1
Inn 6
Bell 2
Inn 7
Bell 2
Inn 8
Jr. 3
Inn 9
Wood 1
Marsee 1
Play-by-play · 650 plays
End of the 9th inning
WSH 15·MIA 7
· ·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Hernández grounded out to second.
· ·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Shinnosuke Ogasawara pitches to Heriberto Hernandez
· ·
WSH 15·MIA 7
· ·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Hicks flied out to center.
· ·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Shinnosuke Ogasawara pitches to Liam Hicks
· ·
WSH 15·MIA 7
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Winkler doubled to left.
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Shinnosuke Ogasawara pitches to Jack Winkler
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Navarreto grounded out to shortstop.
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Shinnosuke Ogasawara pitches to Brian Navarreto
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Marsee homered to right center (402 feet).
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
WSH 15·MIA 6
Shinnosuke Ogasawara pitches to Jakob Marsee
·
WSH 15·MIA 7
Team stats
WSH
Away
Stat
MIA
Home
15
Runs
7
19
Hits
10
0
Errors
0
36
TB
19
4
HR
2
4
BB
6
6
K
4
19
LOB
18
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 81 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
57.5%
ensemble · MIA favored
Elo Static
57.7%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
57.8%
P(MIA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
57.0%
P(MIA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.36 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.