
CHC
76-55

LAA
61-69
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
CHC 4 · LAA 3 (by 1)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CHC +7pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| LAA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs went into Los Angeles Angels and beat them, 4–3. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Nico Hoerner
2B
4-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
LAA · top performer

Taylor Ward
LF
4-2
AB-H
2
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CHC
76-55
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-5 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.992 | ||||||||
| Team | 8-34 | 34 | 4 | 8 | 4 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 9 | 1 |
LAA
61-69
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-35 | 35 | 3 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 4.1 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.148 | |||||||
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 5 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
LAA
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
7
4
Runs
3
1
Errors
0
Current series
CHC win series 3-0
Season series
CHC win series 3-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 15pp · Bottom 9th Inning
N. Hoerner
2BBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1.000 OPS
J. Taillon
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 3 K · 1 ER · 3 H
T. Ward
LFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
K. Hendricks
SPStarting pitcher
4.1 IP · 2 K · 4 ER · 5 H · 3 BB
How it ended
CHC beat LAA 4-3.
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
LAA vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHoerner · doubled to center, Happ scored.
Rengifo · singled to center.
Moore · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| LAA | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Period scoring
CHC won 3 · LAA won 2
Inn 1
Ward 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Tucker 1
Inn 4
Hoerner 1
Inn 5
Crow-Armstrong 1
Inn 6
Ward 2
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 580 plays
End of the 9th inning
CHC 4·LAA 3
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Teodosio struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
−14pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Daniel Palencia pitches to Bryce Teodosio
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Moore struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
−15pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 3
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Daniel Palencia pitches to Christian Moore
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Lugo ran for Moncada
·
CHC 4·LAA 3
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Moncada walked, Rengifo to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
+10pp
Pitch 7 : Ball 4
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Daniel Palencia pitches to Yoan Moncada
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Moncada hit for Peraza
·
CHC 4·LAA 3
· ·
CHC 4·LAA 3
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
LAA
Home
4
Runs
3
8
Hits
7
1
Errors
0
10
TB
11
0
HR
1
5
BB
1
5
K
9
13
LOB
11
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
125
projections · 71 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.4%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
42.5%
P(LAA win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
41.2%
P(LAA win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
42.6%
P(LAA win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.64 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 16 players in cohort