
TOR
73-53

PIT
53-73
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
PIT wins
TOR 2 · PIT 5 (by 3)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked TOR +10pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| PIT | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 5 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
ittsburgh Pirates held off Toronto Blue Jays, 5–2.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
TOR · top performer

Nathan Lukes
RF
2-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
PIT · top performer

Spencer Horwitz
1B
3-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


TOR
73-53
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT25.920 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 1-2 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 6-32 | 32 | 2 | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 11 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 6 | 5 | 3 | 6 | 8 | 0 |
PIT
53-73
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-3 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT24.85 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.765 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 6-28 | 28 | 5 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 6 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 8 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantTOR
PIT
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
6
Hits
6
2
Runs
5
3
Errors
0
Current series
PIT wins series 2-1
Season series
PIT leads series 1-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 21pp · Top 8th Inning
N. Lukes
RFBatter of the game
1-for-2 · 1.000 OPS
K. Gausman
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 4 K · 2 ER · 5 H · 2 BB
S. Horwitz
1BBatter of the game
2-for-3 · 1 R · 1.333 OPS
P. Skenes
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 8 K · 2 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
How it ended
PIT beat TOR 5-2. Barger's play in the top 8th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (21pp).
Win probability
PIT vs TOR
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactCanario · singled to center, N. Gonzales scored, Triolo to third.
Peguero · walked.
Barger · grounded into double play, second to shortstop to first, Springer out at second.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOR | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| PIT | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | — | 5 |
Period scoring
TOR won 1 · PIT won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Canario 1
Inn 3
Jr. 1
Reynolds 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Peguero 1
Inn 8
Davis 2
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 557 plays
· ·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Schneider lined out to third.
· ·
TOR 2·PIT 5
+0.9pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Clement to second on fielder's indifference.
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Clement to second on fielder's indifference.
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Dennis Santana pitches to Davis Schneider
· ·
TOR 2·PIT 5
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Clement hit by pitch.
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
−0.7pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Dennis Santana pitches to Ernie Clement
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Varsho struck out swinging.
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
+0.9pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Dennis Santana pitches to Daulton Varsho
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Bichette grounded out to pitcher.
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
+2pp
Pitch 1 : Ball In Play
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Dennis Santana pitches to Bo Bichette
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Santana relieved Nicolas
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Top of the 9th inning
TOR 2·PIT 5
End of the 8th inning
TOR 2·PIT 5
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Kiner-Falefa popped out to second.
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
·
TOR 2·PIT 5
Team stats
TOR
Away
Stat
PIT
Home
2
Runs
5
6
Hits
6
3
Errors
0
7
TB
8
0
HR
0
1
BB
6
11
K
8
8
LOB
18
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
2 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
120
projections · 86 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.4%
ensemble · TOR favored
Elo Static
40.4%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
42.3%
P(PIT win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
40.6%
P(PIT win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.85 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
94% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.