
CHC
76-56

SF
64-68
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CHC
league avg
SF
.725
OPS
.715
.726
.332
OBP
.319
.308
4.60
Runs / G
4.50
4.13
4.27
Team ERA
4.17
4.58
1.25
WHIP
1.31
1.41
8.1
K / 9
8.5
8.0
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
SF wins
CHC 2 · SF 5 (by 3)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHC +9pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| SF | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
an Francisco Giants held off Chicago Cubs, 5–2.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CHC · top performer

Pete Crow-Armstrong
CF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
SF · top performer

Heliot Ramos
LF
3-3
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .261 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .262 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .244 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .256 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .261 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .227 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .288 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .246 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .230 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .217 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .250 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .236 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 35 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 10 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 8 | 92 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 15 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 7 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 10 | 122 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .264 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .252 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .223 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| .240 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .245 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | |
| .228 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| .212 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .209 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .097 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Team | 30 | 5 | 7 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 10 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6.0 | 7 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 101 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 19 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 18 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 10 | 145 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCHC
SF
No arsenal data yet for this team’s pitchers.
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
8
Hits
7
2
Runs
5
0
Errors
0
Current series
SF wins series 3-0
Season series
SF leads series 3-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 17pp · Bottom 5th Inning
P. Crow-Armstrong
CFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 R · 1.000 OPS
M. Boyd
SPStarting pitcher
5.1 IP · 8 K · 5 ER · 6 H · 3 BB
H. Ramos
LFBatter of the gamePerfect day
3-for-3 · 1 R · 2.000 OPS
J. Verlander
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 5 K · 2 ER · 7 H · 2 BB
How it ended
SF beat CHC 5-2.
Win probability
SF vs CHC
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactShaw · singled to left, Happ scored, Swanson to third.
Ramos · doubled to left, Matos scored.
Chapman · homered to left center (400 feet), Flores scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| SF | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 5 |
Period scoring
CHC won 1 · SF won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Flores 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Shaw 1
Inn 5
Kelly 1
Ramos 1
Inn 6
Chapman 2
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 524 plays
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Caissie struck out swinging.
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
+1pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Ryan Walker pitches to Owen Caissie
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Caissie hit for Turner
·
CHC 2·SF 5
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Castro struck out swinging.
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
+2pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Ryan Walker pitches to Willi Castro
· ·
CHC 2·SF 5
Castro hit for Shaw
·
CHC 2·SF 5
·
CHC 2·SF 5
Swanson singled to center.
·
CHC 2·SF 5
−2pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
CHC 2·SF 5
Ryan Walker pitches to Dansby Swanson
·
CHC 2·SF 5
·
CHC 2·SF 5
Hoerner grounded out to second.
·
CHC 2·SF 5
+2pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
CHC 2·SF 5
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
·
CHC 2·SF 5
Team stats
CHC
Away
Stat
SF
Home
2
Runs
5
8
Hits
7
0
Errors
0
10
TB
15
0
HR
2
2
BB
3
10
K
10
10
LOB
10
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 79 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
40.5%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
40.8%
P(SF win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
40.0%
P(SF win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
42.2%
P(SF win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.91 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
94% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 13 players in cohort