
ATL
56-68

CLE
63-60
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
ATL
league avg
CLE
.744
OPS
.717
.689
.320
OBP
.319
.317
5.06
Runs / G
4.50
4.01
3.29
Team ERA
4.18
3.75
1.18
WHIP
1.31
1.26
8.8
K / 9
8.5
▶9.3
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
ATL wins
ATL 5 · CLE 4 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CLE +6pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
tlanta Braves went into Cleveland Guardians and beat them, 5–4. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
ATL · top performer

Jurickson Profar
LF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
CLE · top performer

Bo Naylor
C
5-4
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .246 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| .264 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .303 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .236 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .253 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .226 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .207 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| .229 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .231 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 38 | 5 | 10 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 12 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 92 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 27 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 24 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 13 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 17 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 4 | 4 | 6 | 10 | 173 |
| Player | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .281 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .228 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .291 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| .238 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .184 | 5 | 0 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .235 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .209 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .212 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| .229 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .178 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .230 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 36 | 4 | 10 | 4 | 0 | 6 | 10 |
| Player | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.2 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 6 | 107 | |
| 1.1 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 3 | 34 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 22 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 12 | 188 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantATL
CLE
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
10
Hits
10
5
Runs
4
1
Errors
2
Current series
ATL wins series 3-0
Season series
ATL wins series 3-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 29pp · Top 6th Inning
J. Profar
LFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.850 OPS
E. Fedde
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 5 K · 4 ER · 6 H · 3 BB
B. Naylor
CBatter of the game
4-for-5 · 1.600 OPS
L. Allen
RPStarting pitcher
4.2 IP · 6 K · 1 ER · 5 H · 3 BB
How it ended
ATL beat CLE 5-4. J. Profar led the way — 2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.850 OPS. Profar's play in the top 6th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (29pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
CLE vs ATL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactSchneemann · tripled to center, Jones scored and Kwan scored.
Profar · homered to right (339 feet), Alvarez Jr. scored.
Manzardo · flied out to center.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ATL | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| CLE | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Period scoring
ATL won 3 · CLE won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Jr. 1
Inn 3
Manzardo 1
Inn 4
Schneemann 2
Inn 5
Allen 1
Inn 6
Profar 2
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 680 plays
End of the 9th inning
ATL 5·CLE 4
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Jones struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
−7pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Nolan Jones
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Arias lined out to left.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
−11pp
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Gabriel Arias
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Rocchio struck out looking.BIG MOMENT
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
−11pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Brayan Rocchio
· ·
ATL 5·CLE 4
·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Naylor singled to right.BIG MOMENT
·
ATL 5·CLE 4
+12pp
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Raisel Iglesias pitches to Bo Naylor
·
ATL 5·CLE 4
Team stats
ATL
Away
Stat
CLE
Home
5
Runs
4
10
Hits
10
1
Errors
2
14
TB
14
1
HR
0
4
BB
6
12
K
10
23
LOB
27
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
121
projections · 83 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
56.6%
ensemble · CLE favored
Elo Static
55.8%
P(CLE win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
57.3%
P(CLE win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
56.3%
P(CLE win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.62 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.