
PHI
69-51

CIN
64-58
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CIN wins
PHI 0 · CIN 8 (by 8)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked PHI +2pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
incinnati Reds held off Philadelphia Phillies, 8–0. It was a wire-to-wire rout.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PHI · top performer

Bryson Stott
2B
3-1
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
CIN · top performer

Ke'Bryan Hayes
3B
2-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


PHI
69-51
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT29.798 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT25.818 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.381 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.688 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 3-30 | 30 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 7 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 10 | 8 | 7 | 2 | 10 | 1 |
CIN
64-58
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.992 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2-2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.941 | ||||||||
| Team | 10-33 | 33 | 8 | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 10 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPHI
CIN
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
3
Hits
10
0
Runs
8
2
Errors
0
Current series
CIN wins series 2-1
Season series
Series tied 3-3
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 15pp · Top 5th Inning
B. Stott
2BBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 0.667 OPS
C. Sanchez
SPStarting pitcher
6.0 IP · 6 K · 3 ER · 7 H · 1 BB
K. Hayes
3BBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-2 · 1 R · 2.000 OPS
H. Greene
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 6 K · 0 ER · 3 H
How it ended
CIN beat PHI 8-0.
Win probability
CIN vs PHI
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactMarsh · grounded out to first.
Hays · doubled to left, De La Cruz scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 4 | 0 | — | 8 |
Period scoring
PHI won 0 · CIN won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Marte 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Marte 2
Inn 7
Andujar 4
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 504 plays
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Castellanos flied out to right.
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Emilio Pagan pitches to Nick Castellanos
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Marchán struck out swinging.
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Emilio Pagan pitches to Rafael Marchan
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Harper struck out swinging.
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Emilio Pagan pitches to Bryce Harper
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pagán relieved Moll
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Top of the 9th inning
PHI 0·CIN 8
End of the 8th inning
PHI 0·CIN 8
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Espinal struck out looking.
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Looking
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Joe Ross pitches to Santiago Espinal
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Stephenson struck out swinging.
·
PHI 0·CIN 8
Team stats
PHI
Away
Stat
CIN
Home
0
Runs
8
3
Hits
10
2
Errors
0
4
TB
15
0
HR
1
1
BB
2
10
K
10
9
LOB
9
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
120
projections · 79 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.8%
ensemble · PHI favored
Elo Static
48.1%
P(CIN win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
47.8%
P(CIN win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
49.6%
P(CIN win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.79 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
95% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 16 players in cohort