
PHI
69-50

CIN
63-58
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CIN wins
PHI 1 · CIN 6 (by 5)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked PHI +3pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
incinnati Reds held off Philadelphia Phillies, 6–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
PHI · top performer

Bryce Harper
1B
4-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
CIN · top performer

Santiago Espinal
3B
2-2
AB-H
0
R
0
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


PHI
69-50
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT29.798 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT2744 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT27.148 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.225 | ||||||||
| Team | 5-31 | 31 | 1 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.1 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 3 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 10 | 6 | 6 | 2 | 4 | 1 |
CIN
63-58
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT28.586 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT23.40 | ||||||||
| 2-2 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 10-32 | 32 | 6 | 10 | 6 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 1 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 10 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantPHI
CIN
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
5
Hits
10
1
Runs
6
0
Errors
0
Current series
CIN wins series 2-1
Season series
PHI leads series 3-2
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 21pp · Bottom 3rd Inning
B. Harper
1BBatter of the game
1-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.250 OPS
R. Suarez
SPStarting pitcher
5.1 IP · 3 K · 6 ER · 10 H · 2 BB
S. Espinal
3BBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-2 · 2.000 OPS
B. Singer
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.0 IP · 6 K · 0 ER · 3 H
How it ended
CIN beat PHI 6-1. Steer's play in the bottom 3rd inning drove the biggest swing of the night (21pp).
Win probability
CIN vs PHI
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactSteer · doubled to left, Friedl scored and Trevino scored.
Andujar · homered to left (366 feet).
Hays · walked.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PHI | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | — | 6 |
Period scoring
PHI won 0 · CIN won 3
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Steer 2
Inn 4
Andujar 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Trevino 2
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Harper 1
Play-by-play · 481 plays
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
Castellanos struck out swinging.
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
Sam Moll pitches to Nick Castellanos
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
Harper homered to right center (410 feet).
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Looking
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Sam Moll pitches to Bryce Harper
·
PHI 1·CIN 6
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Schwarber struck out looking.
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 5 : Ball 2
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 4 : Ball 1
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Swinging
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Sam Moll pitches to Kyle Schwarber
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Turner grounded out to third.
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 5 : Ball In Play
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
PHI 0·CIN 6
Team stats
PHI
Away
Stat
CIN
Home
1
Runs
6
5
Hits
10
0
Errors
0
9
TB
15
1
HR
1
0
BB
2
10
K
4
6
LOB
11
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 15 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
120
projections · 79 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
39.7%
ensemble · PHI favored
Elo Static
46.6%
P(CIN win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
45.6%
P(CIN win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
48.1%
P(CIN win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.03 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
93% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.