
CIN
60-55

CHC
66-48
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CHC wins
CIN 1 · CHC 6 (by 5)
Model verdict
✓ Hit
Picked CHC +7pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 6 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
hicago Cubs held off Cincinnati Reds, 6–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CIN · top performer

TJ Friedl
CF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
0
RBI
CHC · top performer

Seiya Suzuki
RF
2-2
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CIN
60-55
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT2872 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT27.354 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 4-32 | 32 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.2 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 2 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 11 | 6 | 6 | 3 | 4 | 3 |
CHC
66-48
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2-2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.457 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.867 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 11-34 | 34 | 6 | 11 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 4 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 12 | 0 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCIN
CHC
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
4
Hits
11
1
Runs
6
0
Errors
1
Current series
Series tied 3-3
Season series
CHC lead series 5-4
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 13pp · Bottom 6th Inning
T. Friedl
CFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 R · 1.000 OPS
A. Abbott
SPStarting pitcher
6.2 IP · 3 K · 4 ER · 7 H · 2 BB
S. Suzuki
RFBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-2 · 1 HR · 3.500 OPS
C. Horton
SPStarting pitcher
5.2 IP · 6 K · 0 ER · 2 H
How it ended
CHC beat CIN 6-1.
Win probability
CHC vs CIN
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactTurner · singled to center, Hoerner to third.
Suzuki · homered to left (379 feet).
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 2 | — | 6 |
Period scoring
CIN won 0 · CHC won 4
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Suzuki 1
Inn 4
Inn 5
Inn 6
Suzuki 1
Inn 7
Swanson 1
Inn 8
Happ 1
Inn 9
Hays 1
Play-by-play · 510 plays
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
Lux struck out looking.
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Swinging
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
Daniel Palencia pitches to Gavin Lux
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
Hays grounded out to third, Friedl scored.
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
De La Cruz to second on wild pitch by Palencia, Friedl to third on wild pitch by Palencia.
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
De La Cruz to second on wild pitch by Palencia, Friedl to third on wild pitch by Palencia.
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Daniel Palencia pitches to Austin Hays
· ·
CIN 1·CHC 6
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
De La Cruz singled to left, Friedl to second.
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 4 : Ball In Play
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 3 : Ball 2
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Daniel Palencia pitches to Elly De La Cruz
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Steer struck out looking.
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Looking
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 0·CHC 6
Team stats
CIN
Away
Stat
CHC
Home
1
Runs
6
4
Hits
11
0
Errors
1
5
TB
21
0
HR
3
0
BB
3
12
K
4
8
LOB
15
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 14 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 78 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
56.2%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
56.8%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
57.0%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
55.6%
P(CHC win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.62 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.