
CIN
60-54

CHC
65-48
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
CIN wins
CIN 5 · CHC 1 (by 4)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHC +8pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs
Recap · MLB
incinnati Reds went into Chicago Cubs and beat them, 5–1.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CIN · top performer

Spencer Steer
LF
4-2
AB-H
1
R
4
RBI
CHC · top performer

Matt Shaw
RF
3-1
AB-H
1
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


CIN
60-54
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.838 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.483 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.992 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT23.40 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9-34 | 34 | 5 | 9 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 8 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 8 | 1 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 | 1 |
CHC
65-48
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT25.716 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 1-4 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
SPRINT29.294 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 1-3 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.992 | ||||||||
| Team | 4-31 | 31 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 6.1 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 2.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 9 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCIN
No arsenal data yet for this team’s pitchers.
CHC
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
9
Hits
4
5
Runs
1
1
Errors
0
Current series
Series tied 3-3
Season series
Series tied 4-4
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 38pp · Top 7th Inning
S. Steer
LFBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
Z. Littell
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
7.0 IP · 8 K · 1 ER · 3 H · 2 BB
M. Shaw
RFBatter of the game
1-for-3 · 1 HR · 1.667 OPS
S. Imanaga
SPStarting pitcherQuality start
6.1 IP · 7 K · 1 ER · 3 H
How it ended
CIN beat CHC 5-1. Steer's play in the top 7th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (38pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
CHC vs CIN
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactSteer · singled to left, Andujar scored.
Shaw · homered to left center (396 feet).
Steer · homered to left center (377 feet), Hays scored and Andujar scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| CHC | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Period scoring
CIN won 1 · CHC won 0
Inn 1
Inn 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Inn 5
Steer 1
Shaw 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Steer 3
Inn 8
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 520 plays
End of the 9th inning
CIN 5·CHC 1
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Hoerner grounded out to first.
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 2 : Ball In Play
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Tony Santillan pitches to Nico Hoerner
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Santillan relieved Moll
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Castro popped out to second.
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Sam Moll pitches to Willi Castro
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Crow-Armstrong struck out looking.
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
−1pp
Pitch 6 : Strike 3 Looking
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Looking
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Sam Moll pitches to Pete Crow-Armstrong
·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Bottom of the 9th inning
CIN 5·CHC 1
Middle of the 9th inning
CIN 5·CHC 1
· ·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Hayes grounded out to shortstop.
· ·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Nate Pearson pitches to Ke'Bryan Hayes
· ·
CIN 5·CHC 1
Team stats
CIN
Away
Stat
CHC
Home
5
Runs
1
9
Hits
4
1
Errors
0
15
TB
7
1
HR
1
1
BB
2
8
K
10
5
LOB
10
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
123
projections · 78 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
58.1%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
58.3%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
58.4%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
57.2%
P(CHC win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.55 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
96% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
5 of 15 players in cohort