
BAL
51-60

CHC
64-46
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
BAL wins
BAL 4 · CHC 3 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CHC +12pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| CHC | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
altimore Orioles went into Chicago Cubs and beat them, 4–3. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
BAL · top performer

Gunnar Henderson
SS
4-2
AB-H
1
R
3
RBI
CHC · top performer

Nico Hoerner
2B
4-3
AB-H
0
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST


BAL
51-60
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2-4 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
SPRINT28.175 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.632 | ||||||||
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-3 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| 2-3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT26.530 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0-1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 7-33 | 33 | 4 | 7 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 9 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 5.0 | 5 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 8 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 11 | 0 |
CHC
64-46
| Batting | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | H-AB | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1-5 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | |
SPRINT26.123 | ||||||||
| 0-2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| 0-5 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| 1-4 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.662 | ||||||||
| 2-4 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT27.969 | ||||||||
| 3-4 | 4 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
SPRINT28.278 | ||||||||
| 1-3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 0-4 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| Team | 8-35 | 35 | 3 | 8 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 11 |
| Pitching | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | HR |
| 7.0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 0 | |
| 0.1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| 0.2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 7 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 9 | 1 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantBAL
CHC
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
7
Hits
8
4
Runs
3
1
Errors
0
Current series
CHC win series 2-1
Season series
Series tied 1-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 50pp · Top 8th Inning
G. Henderson
SSBatter of the game
2-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.750 OPS
T. Sugano
SPStarting pitcher
5.0 IP · 5 K · 3 ER · 5 H · 1 BB
N. Hoerner
2BBatter of the game
3-for-4 · 1.500 OPS
M. Boyd
SPStarting pitcherGem
7.0 IP · 8 K · 0 ER · 4 H
How it ended
BAL beat CHC 4-3. Henderson's play in the top 8th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (50pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Win probability
CHC vs BAL
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactHenderson · homered to right center (416 feet), Holliday scored and Westburg scored.
Kelly · walked.
Crow-Armstrong · struck out swinging.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BAL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| CHC | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
Period scoring
BAL won 1 · CHC won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Hoerner 1
Inn 3
Inn 4
Hoerner 1
Inn 5
Inn 6
Inn 7
Inn 8
Henderson 3
Inn 9
Play-by-play · 567 plays
End of the 9th inning
BAL 4·CHC 3
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Crow-Armstrong struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
−21pp
Pitch 7 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 6 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 5 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Keegan Akin pitches to Pete Crow-Armstrong
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Suzuki walked, Berti to second.BIG MOMENT
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
+6pp
Pitch 6 : Ball 4
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 4 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Keegan Akin pitches to Seiya Suzuki
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Tucker struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
−15pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Foul
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Keegan Akin pitches to Kyle Tucker
· ·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Berti ran for Kelly
·
BAL 4·CHC 3
·
BAL 4·CHC 3
Team stats
BAL
Away
Stat
CHC
Home
4
Runs
3
7
Hits
8
1
Errors
0
11
TB
12
1
HR
0
2
BB
4
9
K
11
8
LOB
15
STATCAST · Tonight’s standouts
4 of 12 players in cohortPlayer projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
128
projections · 80 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
63.3%
ensemble · CHC favored
Elo Static
61.8%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
63.5%
P(CHC win)
33%
weight
Bullpen Park
61.0%
P(CHC win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.04 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
93% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.
Historical comparables
basis · elo_diff + win_prob + day_of_year + total_runs