
LAD
63-45

CIN
56-52
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
LAD
league avg
CIN
.788
OPS
.717
.705
.346
OBP
.319
.312
5.36
Runs / G
4.50
4.19
3.37
Team ERA
4.18
4.68
1.09
WHIP
1.31
1.46
9.1
K / 9
8.5
7.9
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
LAD wins
LAD 5 · CIN 4 (by 1)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CIN +1pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Final play
“End of the 9th inning”
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
os Angeles Dodgers went into Cincinnati Reds and beat them, 5–4. It came down to the final possession.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
LAD · top performer

Tommy Edman
2B
4-1
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
CIN · top performer

Jake Fraley
RF
1-1
AB-H
1
R
2
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .243 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .272 | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | |
| .325 | 5 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .296 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .254 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .281 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .226 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | |
| .250 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .190 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .195 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .103 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 37 | 5 | 11 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 14 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4.0 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 84 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 14 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 12 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 6 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 134 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .270 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .219 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .282 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .281 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .250 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| .239 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .276 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | |
| .209 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .258 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .236 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .250 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .213 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .116 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| Team | 32 | 4 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 5 | 6 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5.1 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | 94 | |
| 0.2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 27 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 25 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 11 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 14 | 163 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantLAD
CIN
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
11
Hits
6
5
Runs
4
0
Errors
2
Current series
LAD win series 2-1
Season series
LAD lead series 2-0
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 38pp · Top 9th Inning
T. Edman
2BBatter of the game
1-for-4 · 1 HR · 1.250 OPS
T. Glasnow
SPStarting pitcher
4.0 IP · 3 K · 4 ER · 4 H · 5 BB
J. Fraley
RFBatter of the gamePerfect day
1-for-1 · 1 HR · 5.000 OPS
N. Lodolo
SPStarting pitcher11-K game
5.1 IP · 11 K · 2 ER · 6 H · 1 BB
How it ended
LAD beat CIN 5-4. Smith's play in the top 9th inning drove the biggest swing of the night (38pp).
Last play
End of the 9th inning
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactEdman · homered to right (342 feet), Freeman scored.
Fraley · homered to right (405 feet), Hays scored.
Smith · doubled to left, Outman scored.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LAD | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
Team stats
LAD
Away
Stat
CIN
Home
5
Runs
4
11
Hits
6
0
Errors
2
16
TB
14
1
HR
2
3
BB
5
14
K
6
20
LOB
13
Win probability
CIN vs LAD
Period scoring
LAD won 3 · CIN won 2
Inn 1
Inn 2
Edman 2
Inn 3
Inn 4
Fraley 2
Inn 5
Cruz 1
Inn 6
Inn 7
Smith 1
Inn 8
Inn 9
Smith 1
Play-by-play · 588 plays
End of the 9th inning
LAD 5·CIN 4
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Stephenson struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
−6pp
Pitch 4 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Pitch 3 : Strike 2 Foul
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 1 Foul
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Alex Vesia pitches to Tyler Stephenson
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Stephenson hit for Lux
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Trevino fouled out to catcher.BIG MOMENT
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
−6pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Pitch 2 : Ball 1
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Alex Vesia pitches to Jose Trevino
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Hinds struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
−6pp
Pitch 5 : Strike 3 Swinging
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Alex Vesia pitches to Rece Hinds
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Vesia relieved Díaz
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Outman in center field.
LAD 5·CIN 4
Hinds hit for Benson
·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Pages in left field.
LAD 5·CIN 4
Bottom of the 9th inning
LAD 5·CIN 4
Middle of the 9th inning
LAD 5·CIN 4
· ·
LAD 5·CIN 4
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
127
projections · 83 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
49.5%
ensemble · LAD favored
Elo Static
51.1%
P(CIN win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
51.0%
P(CIN win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
50.5%
P(CIN win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
0.26 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
98% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.