
CIN
52-49

WSH
40-60
Matchup · 2026
MLB Stats API
CIN
league avg
WSH
.705
OPS
.717
▶.745
.312
OBP
.319
▶.323
4.19
Runs / G
4.50
▶5.44
4.68
Team ERA
4.18
4.66
1.46
WHIP
1.31
▶1.38
7.9
K / 9
8.5
7.7
Postgame · final
Line score, top performers, model verdict against Vegas, and how the closing line shaped up vs the actual outcome.
Final
WSH wins
CIN 8 · WSH 10 (by 2)
Model verdict
✗ Missed
Picked CIN +8pp
Against the spread
No spread
Line score
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| WSH | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 |
What's next
See every model edge for tonight's remaining games and tomorrow's slate side-by-side, or jump straight to DraftKings & FanDuel for the full board.
21+ · we may earn a referral fee · your odds unchanged.
Data via ESPN · MLB Stats API · Baseball Savant
Recap · MLB
ashington Nationals held off Cincinnati Reds, 10–8.
ESPN didn't ship a closing line for this game; book settlement summary unavailable.
ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page
CIN · top performer

Jake Fraley
RF
2-2
AB-H
0
R
1
RBI
WSH · top performer

Brady House
3B
4-3
AB-H
2
R
1
RBI
MLB · Box scoreSTATCAST
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .267 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .215 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .279 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| .284 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .265 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .249 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .277 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .254 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .267 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | |
| .222 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .220 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 35 | 8 | 9 | 6 | 0 | 8 | 3 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.1 | 5 | 7 | 7 | 2 | 1 | 57 | |
| 1.0 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 30 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 20 | |
| 1.1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 29 | |
| 0.1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 9 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 20 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 24 | |
| Team | 8.0 | 15 | 10 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 189 |
| Player | AVG | AB | R | H | RBI | HR | BB | K |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| .279 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | |
| .275 | 4 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | |
| .223 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | |
| .228 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | |
| .279 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .232 | 4 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| .271 | 5 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |
| .165 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | |
| .249 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| .275 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Team | 38 | 10 | 15 | 10 | 1 | 8 | 8 |
| Player | IP | H | R | ER | BB | K | PC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3.2 | 6 | 5 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 72 | |
| 0.1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 12 | |
| 1.0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 21 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | |
| 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 13 | |
| 1.0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 24 | |
| Team | 9.0 | 9 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 3 | 161 |
Pitcher arsenals · per-pitch detail
Statcast · via Baseball SavantCIN
WSH
Stat compare
Headline stats · full table below
9
Hits
15
8
Runs
10
0
Errors
0
Current series
WSH wins series 2-1
Season series
WSH leads series 3-1
Headlines · top performers
Biggest swing: 19pp · Bottom 1st Inning
J. Fraley
RFBatter of the gamePerfect day
2-for-2 · 2.000 OPS
B. Singer
SPStarting pitcher
2.1 IP · 1 K · 7 ER · 5 H · 2 BB
J. Bell
DHBatter of the game
2-for-5 · 1 HR · 1.500 OPS
J. Irvin
SPStarting pitcher
3.2 IP · 1 K · 5 ER · 6 H · 3 BB
How it ended
WSH beat CIN 10-8. Lile's play in the bottom 1st inning drove the biggest swing of the night (19pp).
Clutch moments · top swings
ranked by WP impactWood · doubled to center, Abrams scored.
Lile · tripled to right, Wood scored, Bell scored and Lowe scored.
Fraley · singled to right, Steer scored, Marte to third.
Linescore (innings)
| Team | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | R |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIN | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 |
| WSH | 4 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | — | 10 |
Team stats
CIN
Away
Stat
WSH
Home
8
Runs
10
9
Hits
15
0
Errors
0
10
TB
26
0
HR
1
8
BB
8
3
K
8
21
LOB
26
Win probability
WSH vs CIN
Period scoring
CIN won 2 · WSH won 3
Inn 1
Lile 3
Inn 2
Inn 3
Bell 1
Inn 4
Lux 1
House 1
Inn 5
Marte 1
Inn 6
Rosario 1
Inn 7
Inn 8
Inn 9
Lux 1
Play-by-play · 684 plays
· ·
CIN 8·WSH 10
Marte fouled out to first.
· ·
CIN 8·WSH 10
+3pp
Pitch 6 : Ball In Play
· ·
CIN 8·WSH 10
Pitch 5 : Ball 3
· ·
CIN 8·WSH 10
De La Cruz scored on Finnegan wild pitch, Lux to second on wild pitch by Finnegan.
· ·
CIN 8·WSH 10
De La Cruz scored on Finnegan wild pitch, Lux to second on wild pitch by Finnegan.
· ·
CIN 8·WSH 10
Pitch 4 : Ball 2
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
Pitch 3 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Foul
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
Kyle Finnegan pitches to Noelvi Marte
· ·
CIN 8·WSH 10
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
Benson struck out swinging.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
+5pp
Pitch 3 : Strike 3 Swinging
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Swinging
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
Kyle Finnegan pitches to Will Benson
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
Lux singled to center, McLain scored, De La Cruz to third.BIG MOMENT
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
−5pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
Pitch 2 : Strike 2 Looking
· ·
CIN 6·WSH 10
Pitch 1 : Strike 1 Looking
· ·
CIN 6·WSH 10
Kyle Finnegan pitches to Gavin Lux
· ·
CIN 7·WSH 10
· ·
CIN 6·WSH 10
Hays flied out to center.
· ·
CIN 6·WSH 10
+4pp
Pitch 3 : Ball In Play
· ·
CIN 6·WSH 10
Pitch 2 : Ball 2
· ·
CIN 6·WSH 10
Pitch 1 : Ball 1
· ·
CIN 6·WSH 10
Kyle Finnegan pitches to Austin Hays
· ·
CIN 6·WSH 10
· ·
CIN 6·WSH 10
Player projections
Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.
130
projections · 84 high confidence
Strikeouts
Hits
Total bases
RBIs
Earned runs
Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands
Model ensemble · how the prediction is built
Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.
41.3%
ensemble · CIN favored
Elo Static
42.2%
P(WSH win)
33%
weight
Elo Pitching
40.2%
P(WSH win)
32%
weight
Bullpen Park
43.1%
P(WSH win)
34%
weight
Disagreement
1.21 pp
weighted σ across sub-models
Confidence
92% · high
maps from disagreement
Substrate count
3 / 3 active
ones with full inputs tonight
Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.