Jayden Quaintance

Developmental big. Carried by rebounding (78th); the question marks are scoring efficiency (0th) and passing (9th).

Draft outlook

Where the math lands them

Projected landing

#19

Toronto Raptors

1st round

Model vs the field

The One

#19

vs

Field

#24

In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.

across 3 mock boards

Scouting summary

Developmental big profile. The loudest scout signal: elite wingspan (wingspan 89.25 = 91th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 57 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 24th across 3 boards.

Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.

Two-way profile · how they play

No Synergy two-way data for Quaintance — typically an overseas or G League Elite prospect outside Synergy's college coverage, not a low-efficiency read.

Closest NBA comparisons

Matched on combine measurements (length, frame, explosion, agility) and college production (BPM, TS%, usage, assists), within position group. Each comp's tag shows which basis drove it; the college production + career outcome shown belongs to the comp, never projected onto Quaintance.

“Top X%” = closer to Quaintance than (100−X)% of all drafted bigs on the measurables + production; the bar shows relative closeness among these 5.

1. 1Stephen Zimmerman2016

   top 1%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 5 of 4 production

   Became: Fringe NBA · -0.2 career VORP · 19 g

   College: UNLV '16 · TS 51.0 · BPM -0.1

   Ht6'9"vs6'10"Reach109.0"vs108.5"Wing89.3"vs87.3"Weight253 lbvs234 lbUSG%20.9vs21.9AST%5.1vs6.5BPM-1.1vs-0.1TS%49.6vs51.0Age19.0vs19.8
2. 2Ike Anigbogu2017

   top 1%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production

   Became: Fringe NBA · 0.0 career VORP · 14 g

   College: UCLA '17 · TS 56.4 · BPM 1.2

   Weight253 lbvs252 lbWing89.3"vs90.3"Reach109.0"vs110.5"Ht6'9"vs6'9"Age19.0vs18.7AST%5.1vs2.3USG%20.9vs18.7BPM-1.1vs1.2PORPAG-0.1vs0.9TS%49.6vs56.4
3. 3Festus Ezeli2012

   top 1%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production

   Became: Rotation player · 0.0 career VORP · 170 g

   College: Vanderbilt '12 · TS 56.7 · BPM 3.1

   Ht6'9"vs6'10"Wing89.3"vs89.8"Reach109.0"vs108.0"Weight253 lbvs264 lbAST%5.1vs2.9USG%20.9vs25.7BPM-1.1vs3.1TS%49.6vs56.7PORPAG-0.1vs2.2Age19.0vs22.7
4. 4Jarrett Allen2017

   top 2%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production

   Became: Star · 1× All-Star · 19.4 career VORP · 624 g

   College: Texas '17 · TS 57.1 · BPM 3.3

   Wing89.3"vs89.3"Reach109.0"vs109.5"Ht6'9"vs6'9"Weight253 lbvs234 lbAST%5.1vs5.5Age19.0vs19.2USG%20.9vs22.9BPM-1.1vs3.3TS%49.6vs57.1PORPAG-0.1vs2.7
5. 5Myles Turner2015

   top 2%

   measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production

   Became: Starter · 13.5 career VORP · 713 g

   College: Texas '15 · TS 55.6 · BPM 7.1

   Ht6'9"vs6'10"Wing89.3"vs88.0"Weight253 lbvs239 lbReach109.0"vs112.0"Age19.0vs19.3AST%5.1vs6.2USG%20.9vs23.8TS%49.6vs55.6PORPAG-0.1vs2.6BPM-1.1vs7.1

How the closest comps turned out

Median outcome: Rotation — the typical case among these comps, between the floor and ceiling.

The 15 nearest blended comps. These are the comps' own careers — a range of what the profile has become before, not a projection of Quaintance.

via BartTorvik · percentiles vs B-bucket of all D1 history (2008-26)

4 games· 16.8 mpg

per-game · via barttorvik · percentiles vs all D1 2008-25 at the position

Raw per-game counts — not pace-adjusted; ranked against an 18-season D1 reference where elite-tier percentiles are stable across the window.