
MGoBlog, CC BY-SA 4.0, via Wikimedia Commons
Lead playmaker
Scoring
69
Playmaking
100
Defense
90
Shooting
55
Combine
Max vertical
39.5"p81
Lane agility
10.94sp65
¾ sprint
3.12sp71
Standing reach
95.5"p8
Draft outlook
Projected landing

#41
Miami Heat
2nd roundModel vs the field
The One
#41
Field
#43
In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.
across 3 mock boards
Scouting summary
Lead playmaker profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 99th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 84 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 43rd across 3 boards.
Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.
Mock consensus over time
Draft score breakdown
avg rank 43 across 3 boards
Deterministic signals · v1 rules
Elite BPM
BPM = 99th pct
Short wingspan for position
wingspan = 9th pct
Elite playmaker (G)
AST% = 100th pct
Defensive impact
STL% + BLK% = 90th pct
Plus vertical
max vertical = 81th pct
Consensus risers
latest consensus improved by 18 spots
Trait grades
Combine radar · vs. G-bucket
Wingspan
med 79.8"
76.0"
p9
Standing reach
med 100.0"
95.5"
p8
Max vertical
med 36.5"
39.5"
p81
Standing vert
med 30.0"
31.5"
p69
¾ sprint
med 3.19s
3.12s
p71
Lane agility
med 11.00s
10.94s
p65
Shuttle
med 3.06s
2.91s
p83
College stats · 2025-26 season
37 games · 86% min
labeled Pure PG
Efficiency
Playmaking
Defense
Rebounding
Composite
via BartTorvik · percentiles vs G-bucket of the 2025-26 D1 pool
X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit
Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.
Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · May 30, 2026