Free during beta —Free during beta — to track favorite players + get game alertsto track favorites + alerts

ESPN

PF/C#14 of 32 bigs in 2026· Projected R2

Baba Miller

Developmental big

Cincinnati·6'11" · 208lb·7'2" wing·9'3" reach·9.0" hand·22.4 yo at draft·Palma, Spain

Early 2nd

ATH composite

NCAA dominance

Scoring

Playmaking

Defense

Shooting

Combine

Max vertical

34.5"p66

Lane agility

10.71sp97

¾ sprint

3.23sp79

Standing reach

111.0"p86

Data completeness

grade A · 100/100

7/7 combine drills · D1 stats matched (6/6) · 3 mock boards · birthdate known

measures the data backing this profile — not confidence in the ranking

Skill signature · earned from the data

percentile vs the 2026 class · at position

Glass CleanerDRB 97th · class

The read · from the percentiles

auto-derived · 2026 class

Developmental big. Carried by rebounding (97th) and passing (94th); the question mark is scoring efficiency (9th).

StrengthsRebounding97Passing94

WatchScoring efficiency9

Draft outlook

Where the math lands them

Projected landing

#41

Miami Heat

2nd round

Model vs the field

The One

#41

Field

#35

In line with the field — our board and the consensus agree within a couple of slots.

across 3 mock boards

Scouting summary

Developmental big profile. The loudest scout signal: elite bpm (BPM = 98th pct). Their NCAA dominance composite lands at 78 on a 100 scale. Mock consensus pegs them 35th across 3 boards.

Auto-generated from archetype + top deterministic chip · long-form narrative ships when the generator's AI pass is enabled.

Our board over time

Where we've had him since May 30

now#41▲ Riser · up 11

May 30 · #52Jul 27 · #41

How the score is built

deterministic · auditable

49.4draft scoreboard #41

Market 62% · consensus 35th / 3 boardsModel 38% · ranked 52nd

Our blend weights the mock-consensus board 62% and our deterministic, age-adjusted model 38% — the market had Miller 35th, our model 52nd. The model's own dominance / production / athletic split is in the card above.

Draft score breakdown

How the 49-point composite stacks up

chip delta · +15

Athletic compositeweight 40%71

NCAA dominanceweight 40%78

Mock consensusweight 20%65

avg rank 35 across 3 boards

Deterministic signals · v1 rules

Elite BPM
BPM = 98th pct
+6
High usage + efficient
USG and TS percentiles both clear the v1 trigger
+5
Elite agility
lane agility = 97th pct
+4

Skill radar · the shape of his game

percentile vs the 2026 class · at position

Avg axis 61th · each vertex is a positional percentile in the 2026 class.

Combine radar · vs. B-bucket

7 of 7 drills measured

cohort n=627 · 2000–2025

Wingspan
med 85.8"
85.8"
p48
Standing reach
med 108.0"
111.0"
p86
Max vertical
med 32.5"
34.5"
p66
Standing vert
med 28.5"
31.5"
p81
¾ sprint
med 3.33s
3.23s
p79
Lane agility
med 11.65s
10.71s
p97
Shuttle
med 3.10s
2.70s
p97

Frame & hands · the tape

percentile vs the 2026 class · at position

Height

6'10.5"83

Wingspan diff

+3.3"17

Hand length

9.00"26

Hand width

10.00"61

Wingspan differential = wingspan − barefoot height (the “ape index”); a positive number means longer than tall. Combine measurements, percentile vs the 2026 class at the position.

Combine drills · controlled setting

percentile vs the 2026 class · at position

Shooting & agility at the combine

Spot-up 3PT

13/25 · 52%48

Off-dribble 3PT

13/30 · 43%14

On-move 3PT

13/25 · 52%71

Modified agility

2.70s100

via stats.nba.com draft combine · shooting at the college 3PT distance (makes / attempts)

Two-way profile · how they play

Synergy · per possession · Cincinnati Bearcats

41 / 100 two-way score

Offense

1.13 PPP9

Defense

0.84 allow76

Shot dieteFG 55%3PT rate 19%FT rate 5%

Miller's offensive + defensive efficiency vs the 2026 class, per Synergy possessions.

NBA comps · measurables + production

vs bigs · 2011–2023

Closest NBA comparisons

Matched on combine measurements (length, frame, explosion, agility) and college production (BPM, TS%, usage, assists), within position group. Each comp's tag shows which basis drove it; the college production + career outcome shown belongs to the comp, never projected onto Miller.

“Top X%” = closer to Miller than (100−X)% of all drafted bigs on the measurables + production; the bar shows relative closeness among these 5.

1Mouhamed Gueye2023
top 1%
measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production
Became: Rotation player · 0.4 career VORP · 116 g
College: Washington St. '23 · TS 53.2 · BPM 5.0
Reach111.0"vs110.5"Weight208 lbvs213 lbWing85.8"vs87.3"Ht6'11"vs6'10"PORPAG3.3vs3.7TS%57.6vs53.2USG%22.3vs26.5Age22.4vs20.6BPM9.6vs5.0AST%23.3vs14.1
2Jontay Porter2019
top 1%
measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production
Became: Never reached the NBA · 0 g
College: Missouri '18 · TS 57.1 · BPM 9.6
Weight208 lbvs210 lbReach111.0"vs109.5"Wing85.8"vs84.0"Ht6'11"vs6'10"BPM9.6vs9.6TS%57.6vs57.1USG%22.3vs23.0PORPAG3.3vs2.6AST%23.3vs20.1Age22.4vs19.6
3Kai Jones2021
top 1%
measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production
Became: Rotation player · 0.2 career VORP · 107 g
College: Texas '21 · TS 64.5 · BPM 7.8
Wing85.8"vs85.8"Reach111.0"vs110.5"Weight208 lbvs221 lbHt6'11"vs6'10"PORPAG3.3vs2.8BPM9.6vs7.8USG%22.3vs18.2Age22.4vs20.4TS%57.6vs64.5AST%23.3vs5.4
4Jon Leuer2011
top 1%
measurables + production · matched on 8 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production
Became: Rotation player · 2.0 career VORP · 377 g
College: Wisconsin '11 · TS 56.8 · BPM 6.7
Agility10.71svs10.82sMax vert34.5"vs36.5"Std vert31.5"vs29.5"Wing85.8"vs84.0"Weight208 lbvs223 lbHt6'11"vs6'10"¾ sprint3.23svs3.36sReach111.0"vs105.5"TS%57.6vs56.8Age22.4vs22.1BPM9.6vs6.7USG%22.3vs29.4PORPAG3.3vs5.8AST%23.3vs12.8
5Nerlens Noel2013
top 3%
measurables + production · matched on 4 of 9 measurables · 6 of 4 production
Became: Starter · 7.4 career VORP · 467 g
College: Kentucky '13 · TS 58.3 · BPM 12.8
Weight208 lbvs206 lbReach111.0"vs110.0"Ht6'11"vs6'10"Wing85.8"vs87.8"TS%57.6vs58.3PORPAG3.3vs2.6BPM9.6vs12.8USG%22.3vs18.2Age22.4vs19.2AST%23.3vs9.5

Per-axis gap● near (under ½ SD)● ~1 SD● far (over 1 SD)

Comp outcomes · real careers

10/12 reached the NBA

How the closest comps turned out

2 Starter7 Rotation1 Fringe2 Never reached NBA

Median outcome: Rotation — the typical case among these comps, between the floor and ceiling.

Ceiling

Nerlens Noel2013

Starter · 7.4 VORP

Floor

Nicolas Claxton2019

Never reached NBA

The 15 nearest blended comps (3 too recent to grade). These are the comps' own careers — a range of what the profile has become before, not a projection of Miller.

College teamCincinnatiB12#30 T-Rank18-15SOS tough schedule · top 18%via BartTorvik

College stats · 2025-26 season

Cincinnati· B12

31 games · 75% min

labeled PF/C

Efficiency

TS%
57.6%75
eFG%
54.6%71
USG%
22.3%80
ORTG
112.783
AdjOE
122.292
RIM%
71.5%82

Playmaking

AST%
23.3%98
TO%
17.8%55

Defense

STL%
1.3%59
BLK%
4.2%66
DRTG
87.596
DBPM
+7.198

Rebounding

ORB%
8.3%50
DRB%
27.7%95

Composite

BPM
+9.698
OBPM
+2.591
PORPAG
3.396

via BartTorvik · percentiles vs B-bucket of all D1 history (2008-26)

Per-game production · 2025-26

percentile vs D1 2008-25 · at position

31 games· 31.9 mpg

Points

13.094

Rebounds

10.399

Assists

3.799

Steals

0.790

Blocks

1.289

ShootingFG 52.9%3PT 19.2%FT 65.8%

per-game · via barttorvik · percentiles vs all D1 2008-25 at the position

Raw per-game counts — not pace-adjusted; ranked against an 18-season D1 reference where elite-tier percentiles are stable across the window.

X-factor · Risk · Scheme fit

Long-form scouting prose ships when the generator's AI narrative pass is enabled. The deterministic chip list above carries the same information as structured signals.

Generated by deterministic-v3-ageadj-consensus · Jun 25, 2026

Get the 2027 big board the day it drops

Plus pick-by-pick grades on draft night — and we grade our own board against the actual draft, misses included. Free, double opt-in.