Free during beta —to track favorites + alerts

Portland Fire at Washington Mystics

POR
POR

POR

8-9

PregameSun, 3:00 PM EDT
WSH
WSH

WSH

6-7

Verdict

Pass · no edge tonight.

The model doesn't see daylight against the posted line on this game. We don't surface negative-EV picks; check the drill-down for sub-model context.

WNBASun, Jun 286/28 - 3:00 PM EDTSeriesstarts 6/28

Preview · WNBA

ortland Fire visit Washington Mystics Sunday at 6/28 - 3:00 PM EDT. WSH is 3-4 in their last 7.

The market hasn't shipped a line worth tagging key numbers on yet — check back closer to first pitch.

ByTheOnemodel/auto-generated · live odds + scouting data/refreshes with the page

Updated 0s ago

Season series

Series starts 6/28

Jun 28PORPOR@WSHWSHtoday
Jul 16PORPOR@WSHWSHupcoming
Aug 23WSHWSH@PORPORupcoming

Scouting report

POR @ WSH

6/28 - 3:00 PM EDT

Tale of the tape

PORmetricWSH

8-9

Record

6-7

#5

Conf rank

#5

-5.9

Pt diff

-4.3

W1

Streak

W1

4-6

Last 10

4-6

Composite signals from ESPN standings + 21-day power rolling. NBA pace / ORtg / DRtg from ESPN core team-stats; NFL yards-per-game from nflverse aggregation. Park factors, weather, KenPom-class metrics still on the roadmap.

Team stats

POR

Away

Stat

WSH

Home

45

FG %

44

Drill down

Sub-model tables · ensemble breakdown · last meeting · book shop · player props

Model ensemble · how the prediction is built

3 sub-models, blended.

Each sub-model uses a different rating substrate. Bayesian model averaging weights them by rolling Brier score so the ensemble inherits each model's strengths. Disagreement flags games where the sub-models don't see eye-to-eye — lower confidence, wider band.

43.9%

ensemble · POR favored

  • Elo Static

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(WSH win)

    33%

    weight

  • Elo Recent

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(WSH win)

    31%

    weight

  • Pace Efficiency

    fallback · inputs missing

    50.0%

    P(WSH win)

    35%

    weight

Disagreement

0.00 pp

weighted σ across sub-models

Confidence

100% · high

maps from disagreement

Substrate count

0 / 3 active

ones with full inputs tonight

Weights recalibrated nightly on a 90-day rolling window with strict point-in-time correctness — no model gets credit for a game it hasn't seen. Headline % is Platt-scaled per league; sub-model rows show raw BMA inputs.

Player projections

WSH vs POR.

Per-player stat projections built from a recency-weighted blend of the last ten games, season average, and matchup context. Confidence reflects sample size and stability — the top of each list is who to watch.

120

projections · 0 high confidence

Points

  • Sonia CitronWSH
    16.4± 10.2low
  • Kiki IriafenWSH
    14.5± 9.3low
  • Shakira AustinWSH
    14.2± 7.6low

Rebounds

  • Kiki IriafenWSH
    8.7± 6.2low
  • Shakira AustinWSH
    8.1± 4.2low
  • Emily EngstlerPOR
    5.2± 3.4medium

Assists

  • Carla LeitePOR
    5.9± 3.6medium
  • Sonia CitronWSH
    3.6± 2.8low
  • Teja OblakPOR
    3.4± 2.5low

Blocks

  • Emily EngstlerPOR
    1.9± 0.9medium
  • Shakira AustinWSH
    1.4± 1.4low
  • Megan GustafsonPOR
    0.6± 0.9medium

Steals

  • Bridget CarletonPOR
    1.4± 1.2medium
  • Emily EngstlerPOR
    1.3± 1.4medium
  • Rori HarmonWSH
    1.0± 1.7low

Projections recompute every 30 minutes · prop lines plug in once sportsbook ingest lands

Matchup · 2026

Team rate stats vs league

wehoop

POR

POR

league avg

WSH

WSH

44.9%

FG%

44.4

44.5%

33.7%

3PT %

33.1

29.3%

81.5

PPG

85.3

81.4

19.8

Assists / G

18.0

18.8

14.9

Turnovers / G

13.0

16.3

Data via ESPN · wehoop